I've been a dedicated NL1000 user since I started ML 15+ years ago and have always had excellent results with it...but I swear there's such a continuous parade of posts from people who claim they've had rust after using it that I'm beginning to wonder if I've just been lucky all these years...getting nervous thinking "what if"...I've got my rifles and calibers about where I want to be and would be sick if I pulled one out of a case and found it rusted.
I've gotten into the habit of periodically (couple times a year) checking / relubing bores based on these posts but that's a lot of work in an out of cases if you have a number of rifles, etc.
So here's a question...as easy as it would be to do it, if I added a simple step to my cleaning/drying/lubing process of running a sloppy wet patch of WD40 downbore before I plastered it with NL1000, would that be of any benefit?
And would there be any downside to doing this regarding BP fouling since I assume it's a petroleum based product?
Or would I be as well off or even better off running a sloppy wet patch of Hoppe's No9 BP PLUS downbore first (instead of WD40) before I plaster it with NL1000 like I always do?
I've gotten into the habit of periodically (couple times a year) checking / relubing bores based on these posts but that's a lot of work in an out of cases if you have a number of rifles, etc.
So here's a question...as easy as it would be to do it, if I added a simple step to my cleaning/drying/lubing process of running a sloppy wet patch of WD40 downbore before I plastered it with NL1000, would that be of any benefit?
And would there be any downside to doing this regarding BP fouling since I assume it's a petroleum based product?
Or would I be as well off or even better off running a sloppy wet patch of Hoppe's No9 BP PLUS downbore first (instead of WD40) before I plaster it with NL1000 like I always do?