Apparently not because they had different caps,...
Mike
what did an 1850's Percussion cap look like? I wonder if the original percussion caps even blew apart like ours now days do. I want to think they acted like they do when I put a cap collar on them. There is no Cap jam with a collar. But they add a whole bunch of time in loading and reloading.
Can those springs simply be reshaped and re-tempered to increase the the hammer tension? It seems to me that just straightening the spring a bit would increase the the hammer force considerable?
The stronger the main, the more wear on the lock (doubled or not).
As for originals, they probably did. They more than likely didn't shoot for "fun" like we do.
Fast forward to today, we have shooting sports, competitions and such. In order to do that the copies, powder, caps, lubes, are "todays" so that's what we have to deal with. Cowboy shooters want speed . . . heavy springs aren't conducive to speed. Probably the European market thinks the same way so that's what Uberti caters to. Easier to ADAPT to what we have today unless you can supply the market with what YOU think it should be . . .
I find it's easier to work with what we have available . . .
Mike
Caps. The caps available in the Civil War period were specific to the type gun. Eleys mentioned it on the label. It was the subject of a letter from Major R. H. K. Whitely from the New York Arsenal on July 5 1862 to Brigadier General Ripley, Chief of the Ordnance Department, "First, a cap suitable for Colt's pistol does not suit Savages or Starrs, because the mainspring is too weak to explode it.
Second, a cap suitable for Savages or Starrs does not suit Colts, because the hammer drives it in pieces, a fragments often lodges in front of the cock, and renders the arm useless after the first fire. On this account our spies carry two pistols, and have had to depend on the second for safety for the reason above stated. Therefore, I am compelled to have two qualities made, one for the Colts, answering in thickness of copper to the Eleys Double Waterproof, and the other for Savages and Starrs Eleys metal-lined."
Ripley forwarded the letter to Major W. A. Thornton at the West Troy Arsenal and requested that "Please see that all revolvers made for this department are suited to fire the same caps as Colts Army pistols"
Yes, caps were different, made specifically for Colts pistols in the day. Today, we have generic caps basically, and its what we have to live with. Ive come across a few caps of some unremembered brand that didnt fragment when fired and save them for the 1860 I have handy for serious duty, like going out in my underwear to check sprinklers or feed birds,
The methods developed over time to improve the pistols functional reliability with the available caps is intriguing and heartening, in that its not just a given now that "percussion colts jam with broken caps pieces, thats just how it is". We are learning more about them all the time, with Mike and others figuring out the quirks and kinks to make them more reliable and improve them.
I came into a uberti SAA type revolver, the hammer spring was not particularly strong. Its ben discussed in various places that the Ubertis were known for weak hammer springs and firing pin hits. the Starline site even mentions it. I considered finding a factory spring from a Colt SAA to buy or trade into, as many put weaker springs in them. In looking around the Colt and cowboy shooter forums the idea of tweeking the existing spring surfaced and I recalled a known pistolsmith tweeking S&W mainsprings to get the DA pull he wanted. He used a wedge, back and forth a bit until satisfied. Th guns hadnt shown any tendency to either misfire or break springs after such work (that was only one small aspect of the overall action work). It doesnt take much to change the feel.
I took the backstrap off the gun and removed the mainspring. I re-installed it behind the hammer, then clamped the spring to the front strap right above the screw with a crescent wrench so the tweeking wasnt stressing the screw hole, and carefully bent the spring rearward until it was about 3/16-1/4" behind the hammer, then re-installed it back under the roller. It noticeably increased tension. I have no way currently to measure the hammer pull to compare. Im primarily a field user, Im concerned with functional reliability first, other things can be worked with to improve action feel, but soft springs isnt a part of any of mine. YMMV of course. If I someday wear out the hammer, Ill cross that bridge when I come to it, but I believe its certainly not more tension than any of the factory Colt SAAs Ive had in the distant past.