Breech Fouling Scraper

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Jappo

Poco Loco
MLF Supporter
Joined
Oct 24, 2022
Messages
1,492
Reaction score
1,317
Location
Texas
Looking for info on a double barrel shotgun. I put a bore scope in my barrels and noticed a lot of crud in the breech area. As it looks like removing the plugs is out of the question, I'm thinking of using a breech fouling scraper. But I'm not sure what size to order. My bores average out to .675. I think they are cylinder bore and not choked.
Maybe even scraping the sides.
Any help appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Photo_20241203115810.jpg
    Photo_20241203115810.jpg
    153.1 KB
  • Photo_20241203115122.jpg
    Photo_20241203115122.jpg
    117.1 KB
That's a pretty nasty mess. I think I would opt for a worm with tow. For a jag, you can most likely find a .69 size, and file it down in a drill press, and recut the grooves. How old is this gun?
 
That's a pretty nasty mess. I think I would opt for a worm with tow. For a jag, you can most likely find a .69 size, and file it down in a drill press, and recut the grooves. How old is this gun?
Not sure how old it is. Pre-breech loading I'm sure. It has fancy scrolling all over the barrel. And what looks like brass inletting or inlays.
I have some steel mesh and a brass rod. I chucked it to my drill motor and it cleaned up pretty good.
I'm using a brass brush to finish it up before I lube it.
I'll try to get out sometime this week and proof it. I have plenty cannon fuse.
I run the bore scope and couldn't see any problems in there. Some pitting is all. Nothing looked deep to be serious.
 

Attachments

  • 20241203_144944.jpg
    20241203_144944.jpg
    3.3 MB
  • 20241203_144901.jpg
    20241203_144901.jpg
    1.4 MB
  • 20241203_144835.jpg
    20241203_144835.jpg
    2.5 MB
  • 20241203_144834.jpg
    20241203_144834.jpg
    3 MB
  • 20241203_144747.jpg
    20241203_144747.jpg
    2.8 MB
  • 20241203_144719.jpg
    20241203_144719.jpg
    1.1 MB
  • 20241203_144711.jpg
    20241203_144711.jpg
    1,017.8 KB
  • 20241203_144703.jpg
    20241203_144703.jpg
    2.9 MB
  • 20241203_144651.jpg
    20241203_144651.jpg
    2.8 MB
Considering the appearance of the nasty area inside, and the fact it's damascus barrel, I would stand WAY back to test it. I imagine if it was magnafluxed, it would leak like a sieve. I would personally either re-line it, or hang it on the wall to look at. No sense injuring either the gun or yourself. I think the wall hanging idea would be the best for this. The more I look at the pictures, the more it gives me the heebie jeebies! When you say you THINK it's pre-breechloading, that tells me you know little about these and the safety factors.
 
Considering the appearance of the nasty area inside, and the fact it's damascus barrel, I would stand WAY back to test it. I imagine if it was magnafluxed, it would leak like a sieve. I would personally either re-line it, or hang it on the wall to look at. No sense injuring either the gun or yourself. I think the wall hanging idea would be the best for this. The more I look at the pictures, the more it gives me the heebie jeebies! When you say you THINK it's pre-breechloading, that tells me you know little about these and the safety factors.
What I meant is that it's older than a breech loader. 1870s ? I have two breech loaders that I use black powder shells. Both are Damascus. I restored both of them. Both were "wall hangers".
I see no reason why this muzzleloader will not hold up. I've shot an old 1861 Springfield converted to shotgun "wallhanger" that was worse than this one.
BTW, I got all the crud out and clean. Lubed and ready to test.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top