rescuemike
36 Cal.
- Joined
- May 31, 2012
- Messages
- 69
- Reaction score
- 3
Unless it’s being done by a qualified Gunsmith…please. drills do not belong in a gun barrel ,after they are made
Unless it’s being done by a qualified Gunsmith…please. drills do not belong in a gun barrel ,after they are made
Never had any problems with mine but have not shot it in decades - I also have one of their flint pistols and the plug has weld marks - it is a 1970. I got it new in kit form. Barrel is actually bored off center. Lock took a lot of tuning to get it to spark well. The rifle - sparked great but had a lousy sear spring.I thought I read that advice from CVA that old 1970 era Spanish made CVA muzzle loaders had potentially poorly threaded breach plugs that could be dangerous and advised not to shoot them.
Also I thought I read that the ownership of CVA changed I the 1970’s so maybe they were just trying to distance the company from past mistakes or warranty obligations.
I built a CVA Kit in 76-77 a 45 cal flintlock, it worked but after reading about the iffy breach plugs I quit using it, still got the rifle.
OP line 3.Nowhere has the OP stated that he has tried to remove what is in the barrel.
OP line 3.
Interesting both of my barrels on my 1853 percussion cape rifle , I just won at auction, were blocked and I did not want to remove the nipples. I got some spring wire from a bicycle cable and after a week of say unblocking the drain via the nipple The crud started to move it took ages finally I thumped the barrels onto a block of lead and a pile of crud came out then it was just cleaning it out with a ramrod. I actually made one with some bits of wire welded to a steel rod. I have had it a year and not shot it. No police permit uk Ps I also cleared one with a ramrod made of copper pipe with the end filed into saw teeth it did well and could not scratch the boreI agree with @desi23's assessment. @MacShay's rifle is from about 1970.
I would consider removing the barrel from the stock. I am not sure, but the nose piece may be threaded into the barrel. Those two screws should be removed. The pins that are in the diamond inlays hold the stock to the barrel. Those pins will have to be removed to separate the barrel from the stock. I do not see pins holding the thimbles in the stock. Are the thimbles threaded into the barrel? If the thimbles are threaded into the barrel, these will have to be removed.
MacShay did not tell us if he poured a penetrating lubricant (Kroil, ATF and acetone, or any other penetrating oil) before trying the ball pullers. What residue was pulled out when the puller was removed? Was it lead or wood from the broken ramrod? Did the ball puller thread into the ball? Being a flint lock rifle, does this rifle have a vent liner? It is hard to tell from the lock picture. Do you now have a hole through the ball? What material was used in the construction of the rod that was used in the attempt to pull the ball? If there is a hole through the obstruction, then the CO2 discharger or grease gun may not work. The touch hole liner will have to be removed to determine a thread pitch for zerk fitting for a grease gun. Because of potential interference issues, the touch hole liner should be removed before considering breech plug removal.
First remove the barrel from the stock. Soak the breech in a bath of penetrating oil. This may require a few days of soaking. If you have a touch hole liner, I would next go to the use of a high-pressure grease gun to move the obstacle. If there is a hole through the obstacle, then it is time to remove the breech plug.
Yes, removing the breech plug is possible and is one of the possible means of removing the obstruction. Proper tools are required. Notably the tools include a heavy work bench, a very sturdy bench smooth jawed vise with wood and leather jaw liners to prevent marring and a very large breech plug wrench or large smooth jawed crescent wrench and a large hammer to provide some impact when trying to unscrew the breech plug. Once the breech plug is removed, a just under bore sized steel rod can be used to drive the blockage out through the breech.
There is so much unknown about the state of your rifle that we can go down about 15 pages of fanciful comments and still leave the obstruction in the barrel.
.
I am one, and wouldn't do it.Unless it’s being done by a qualified Gunsmith…
I think it may be a Muruku reproduction made in Japan from the cast engraving and short trigger I see on it. I have one of there .45 cal Kentucky pistols I picked up for 20 bucks that is a good shooter and sparks fine. I forged out the trigger to a decent length and shape , milled a new front sight blade for it and it shoots fine.Last photo post.
CVA makes great guns. They had a bunch of lawsuits relating to in-line breech plugs
that were poorly threaded. Today they make the barrels used by sharpshooters in
police departments and have re-introduced the Remington 700 under another
name based upon the Bergara barrel brand. CVA is based in Lawrenceville Georgia
with factories in the Basque gunmaking regeon of Spain. Outside of Custom guns,
the CVA line is the highest quality bang for the buck and has good support in the USA.
This excludes BP Revolvers which remain the domain of the Italians. My opinion from
first hand use over the years.
While looking at @FlinterNick's photos, I was thinking that when removing a breech plug, the clamping pressure from the vise should be just ahead of the threads of the breech plug. The clamping pressure can put pressure on the engagement of the threads and make removal more difficult. So, when placing the barrel in the vise for removal of the breech plug, measure to find the end of the threads of the breech plug and mark the barrel in order to clamp the barrel solidly in the vise and not press the barrel threads into the threads of the breech plug. Also, you will have confirmed that the barrel is not loaded.
Enter your email address to join: