I have a Euroarms 1860 Colt, (in disrepair at the moment due to my first chain fire blowing the loading lever catch off) and for one hand shooting, feel and pointability there is "something about" the 1860 Colt. I have also owned a 1851 in .44 calibre. (or .45 the truth be known!) Holding the 1860, and a .45" 1851 side by side, I kind of like the '51 better though.
However, though I would not get rid of my 1860, since I picked up the Uberti Remington Navy, it has become my favorite for sure. I've also "discovered" what a great calibre the .36 is. (.380" the truth be known...!!) It is NOT a weak sister to the .45's, packs a hard punch, but at the same time when loaded down, the smaller ball is a bit better for body shots on wabbits and grouse. When hunting big game with a rifle or Bess I carry the Navy for a small game/survival tool, two legged varmint repellent, and the coup-de-grass if needed. I plan to carry the Plains Pistol when Bess is loaded with shot while hunting grouse.
So I would also consider the Remington Navy, or a 1851, unless it has to be a .45". (I forgot) As you won't be deer hunting with a 1860 or 1858 anyhow, you may find a .36 to be a very nice calibre. Again it is NOT weak.
Judging from my Remington Navy, and my 1860, it's been my experience that the Remington is less likely to jam from cap fragments. For me, the Remington has been more reliable.
By the way, I prefer flint over caps, but decided that for a holster pistol, that I would carry a lot, a percussion might be better, so I went with the cap-gun on the Plains Pistol. But I'm not really sure why a flinter pistol would be dangerous to carry in a holster, as most people say they is...when I really get to thinking about it...?? But a percussion single shot is also a bit more compact.
WV Hillbilly, no I knew you'd take it as intended...but I have seen people on forums/message boards, who seemed to be on there for the single purpose of getting upset and blowing thier corks at people!
:curse:
So I always throw in a "disclaimer"!
Rat