• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

cannon id

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ngp

32 Cal.
Joined
Feb 5, 2011
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Another relic? from my late fathers estate. Any help is appreciated. Thanks

cannon003.jpg


cannon001.jpg
 
Cannon is 22'' in overall length. And looks like about a 7/8 bore.
 
It looks very close to representing the U.S. 24 pounder mentioned in my new thread on model cannon plans.

Paul
 
There appears to be another layer in the bore. It is hard to tell.
 
Show us some pictures.

These things show up all the time, it is cast iron and brittle and intended as a decoration.

If it has a liner, I would be very concerned about it especially if it cast core.

This thing needs some very serious inspection if you are considering shooting it.

Here is some pictures of a similar one made of cast iron.

standard.jpg


standard.jpg


standard.jpg


standard.jpg


standard.jpg


standard.jpg
 
Thanks for all the info.I think I will use the non cannon for a boat anchor.I am pretty sure now that there is no steel liner ....
 
Mounted vertically, muzzle up, you could make an interesting light out of that piece. It would fit pretty well on an end table.
 
WOW scary hope no one was hurt in that accident
has anyone heard of a steel cannon barrel failing on the fireing line
 
buzz said:
WOW scary hope no one was hurt in that accident
has anyone heard of a steel cannon barrel failing on the fireing line

Not one made to safety standards. Some that were not made properly have been reported as failing...

I have never understood the mentality that says you don't need to build to safety standards-they are over built or excessive...ah I think the term for that is a margin of safety built in, so why would want to ignore the margin of safety...Every year we see reports of cannon failures reported and the guns are often built to less the the safety standards. Almost universally the statement made is "we fired it for years with out a problem". To my ears that statement is an ignorant statement. We done it that ways for year will not make you safe.
 
Back
Top