- Joined
- Aug 6, 2005
- Messages
- 7,061
- Reaction score
- 5,350
Very cool. I wonder what the first troops that ever faced these guns thought.
I had misremembered. It was ribaudiaux, not handgonnes, in the Flemish battle that caused a rout.I am away from home and cannot look up specifics, but Medieval Handgonnes: The First Black Powder Infantry Weapons has an account of a battle at the end of the 14th century, in the Low Countries, where one side used handheld gunpowder weapons and were able to deal a notable morale blow to the enemy.
It was not until the early 16th century that shooting would have a decisive role in winning European battles.
By the time the fully developed matchlock musket was in use, matchlock firearms had been in regular use for close to a century and and handgonnes for close to another century before that.
TBH, it's unlikely that only one side had such arms in use. We have no written records of such an engagement although, as you note, it undoubtedly happened somewhere.
We'll never know what went through the minds of the opposing forces in feudal Japan, but perhaps you might get some idea of what it must have been like can be gotten from watching this excerpt from a 16th battle that changed the face of the battlefield in Japan - Nagashino in 1575..........
I recently finished The Italian Wars 1494-1559: War, State and Society In Early Modern Europe, by Christine Shaw and Michael Mallet, and there are many accounts of officers getting struck down by arquebues bullets, which would back that.Wow! The devastation the losing commander felt as he realized his entire world has changed. Probably a scene that played out as lot as guns advanced worldwide.
Enter your email address to join: