Ah, these darned ol' muzzleloaders...just when I thought I had the itch sufficiently scratched with my recent purchase, another interesting one had to come along...
OK...my experience with traditional muzzleloaders has all been with guns whose barrels are held in place by one or more wedges. For cleaning, I put a length of silicone tubing on the nipple and use it to vacuum hot soapy water in and out of the barrel by pumping with a swabbed cleaning rod. Once in a while I take the barrel off for this, but mostly I do it with the gun assembled. No problems so far.
Now I have my eye on a gun which has the barrel attached by means of two barrel bands. Is it a bad idea to frequently or regularly remove this type of barrel for cleaning? It appears that it would be much more time-consuming than the wedge type barrels. Is my usual barrel-on-the-gun method adequate for all cleaning? I'm always wondering and worrying about moisture and rust between the stock and barrel.
In case it matters, the gun is a Parker Hale .58 model 1861 carbine.
OK...my experience with traditional muzzleloaders has all been with guns whose barrels are held in place by one or more wedges. For cleaning, I put a length of silicone tubing on the nipple and use it to vacuum hot soapy water in and out of the barrel by pumping with a swabbed cleaning rod. Once in a while I take the barrel off for this, but mostly I do it with the gun assembled. No problems so far.
Now I have my eye on a gun which has the barrel attached by means of two barrel bands. Is it a bad idea to frequently or regularly remove this type of barrel for cleaning? It appears that it would be much more time-consuming than the wedge type barrels. Is my usual barrel-on-the-gun method adequate for all cleaning? I'm always wondering and worrying about moisture and rust between the stock and barrel.
In case it matters, the gun is a Parker Hale .58 model 1861 carbine.