• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Comparitive recoil table for muzzleloading rifles?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Wolfbane

40 Cal.
Joined
Aug 29, 2005
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Does anybody have a comparative table of recoil for muzzloaders, that compares calibres, charge weights and rifle weights? Or even just calibre and charge weights? :thanks:
 
I have never seen one but you could get recoil data from the muzzle energy. One of Newton's laws: "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" or words to that effect.

You could calculate absolute recoil from knowing the rifle's mass and how much energy is being absorbed.

For myself I have found apparent recoil to have many factors including the shape of the rifle. I used to have a .30-30 that was deadly at both ends. A friend of mine had an original 1886 Winchester .45-70 that would beat you to death. He also had a Sharps .50-140 that wasn't bad to shoot at all. Both rifles weighted about the same but the geometry of the Sharps seemed to absorb more recoil.
 
Thanks gentelmen! I know what you mean about stock design; just fire a a Ruger #3 in 45-70 ..... ::
 
Heh... if you want REAL fun with recoil, try that .45-70 in a T/C Contender. :shocking:

Yes, it hurts. :cry:
 
Mike,

My old Sharps .45-120 weighed about 11 lbs., so how heavy could a lever action rifle be?

-Ray :huh:
 
Static,

You think a Ruger #3 in .45-70 kicks like an S.O.B.? Hah! Try a #1 Tropical in .458 Win. Mag.!!!

-Ray :curse:
 
:imo: In the end it's all down to the way YOU feel it. I am just so bust-up from shooting everything over the last near 50 years that I don't feel it much at all - not a macho thing, it's just that some kick a bit, and others just don't seem to. My Colt .45/.22 ACE had a very pronounced recoil for a teeny .22 in a big frame, but it was MEANT to simulate firing the .45 hardball, and did a pretty good job of doing just that.
Firing the Barrett light .50BMG was great fun, as was the McMillan bolt-action .50BMG...our .338Lapua Mag sniping rifle can be a punisher, too, if you don't snuck up real close to the stock...
But the most noticeably recoiling piece I ever shot was a Natal Native Police Martini carbine in .303 cordite. The 18 inch barrel and the compressed cordite charge was a real whammer in all directions, but by the time I got to shoot it I was well-past caring about recoil. My own S&W model 29 with 4" barrel, shooting 300gr bullets over 25.5gr of 2400, was a mite unpleasant for most folks to shoot, but my pal Rick, who is not only 6ft 10in but built to suit, barely noticed it. 'Hmmm', he said, handing the by then empty piece back to me after firing the lot in less than two seconds, 'sweet little back-up gun y'got there, T'.

My 14" barrelled TC Contender in .35 Whelen or .454 Casull were climbers, too. But only what you'd expect, I dare to opine.

My old Whitworth, with only an 80gr FFFG load behind the 595gr Polisar hex bullet to make it work satisfactorily, goes bang with barely a twitch.

tac :grey:
 
Mike,

My old Sharps .45-120 weighed about 11 lbs., so how heavy could a lever action rifle be?

-Ray :huh:

Can't give you anything definitive but they felt about the same. The 1886 was very heavy for a lever action. Made the 30-30 feel like a toy.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top