Crow#21957
50 Cal.
Can't coning hurt the accuracy of a barrel?
Think about it would the Colonial and Early American gunsmiths gone to the trouble to make an accurate barrel then screw it up by relieving it or coning it.Can't coning hurt the accuracy of a barrel?
My understanding FWIW is that a great many originals that have been examined over the years were coned... I'm sure some of the more knowledgeable folks on here could give a yea or nay on that... Just that I've never heard of a barrel ruined by the tiny amount of taper involved, of course humans being what we are doesn't mean it hasn't happened...Think about it would the Colonial and Early American gunsmiths gone to the trouble to make an accurate barrel then screw it up by relieving it or coning it.
They were not coned. People think filing the grooves to the muzzle is coning, but it's not. The coning tools used today allow shooters to use oversize ball / patch combinations without a short starter that were not used in the old days. Friendship shooters began using such combinations in the early years of the NMLRA. In the old days accurate target rifles were choked to improve accuracy just like the slug rifles used today.My understanding FWIW is that a great many originals that have been examined over the years were coned... I'm sure some of the more knowledgeable folks on here could give a yea or nay on that... Just that I've never heard of a barrel ruined by the tiny amount of taper involved, of course humans being what we are doesn't mean it hasn't happened...
The thing I worry about and perhaps needlessly is long term accuracy if not using a rod guide fit precisely to the cone taper as the whole idea is to facilitate loading without a short starter or loading rod guide. With muzzle loading rifles, crown square and land end/taper angle uniformity, equals accuracy.Can't coning hurt the accuracy of a barrel?
Enter your email address to join: