Dan Phariss said:I would also like to add that without some prior knowledge of how these things were made "I could not make this stuff up".
Dan
That's an interesting observation, now that I think hard on what some of those early imports looked like and how they functioned. Interesting you made the comment you did, getting them to work was a "big issue", as much from misalignment of parts as anything else. Couple had lock geometry that looked like a stoned chimpanzee had laid them out...I'm talking hammers missing nipples completely...stuff like that. I can't recall a single case of barrel failure or rupture in the groups I ran with then. Perhaps it was all the returns that motivated the surviving gun makers to get with the program and start making descent products. :idunno:Loyalist Dave said:I've seen some barrels with Belgian proof marks, on some 1970's vintage flinter "wall hangers", but I don't think they were at all unsafe, as the locks were such junk I don't think you could actually get the guns to function. :shocked2: I don't know if the barrels were simply cheap, or if the makers wanted something that wouldn't necessarily explode if somebody really loaded them and got them to fire.
LD
zimmerstutzen said:Quality two piece> .
Enter your email address to join: