I hear this a lot, that calibers below .40 or thereabout foul much worse than the larger calibers in a rifle. Is this true at all?
In the field when swabbing the bore of my .32 I carry a .30 caliber jag so I can pull the fouling out instead of pushing it into the powder charge.I think it depends on the particular gun, the amount of and brand of powder, as well as the type of lube. My Pedersoli Frontier .32 with a 20-25 grain load of 3f Diamondback, which I hear is no longer available, and a patch lubed with Hoppe's Black Powder lube and solvent could easily do 6 or 7 shots before loading becomes difficult or accuracy falls off.
One negative of the .32 is the difficulty in getting the jag turned down to where you can slide the patch by the fouling and then twist and pull most of it out as you would with a larger bore. The patent breech of the Frontier in .32 is obviously quite small, so it doesn't take much crud to create misfires. I think that's why it works better for me to load with a damp patch, which seems to push the crud down on top of the powder to be ejected with the next shot. That's what seems to work best for me at any rate. On my .45 and .50, I use Dutch's dry patch lube and wipe between shots.
I don’t find it to be so. It’s all in the lube and patched ball combo. I shoot my squirrel rifle dozens of times and the last to load is as easy as the first. Keep it soft. Push it down. Blow it out. Sort of a free cushion wad.
Well said my friend.Also, as this subject is one of those that can get prickly, I will say, my entire focus has always been on finding a lube/patch/ball combo for each gun that doesn’t require swabbing between shots and that doesn’t leave hard crud and crud rings and also giving me no degradation of accuracy. I understand other lines of thinking are just as valid and work just as well as mine. My thoughts have always been anything that I don’t have to do should be cut out and anything I don’t have to carry should be left at home. I often squirrel hunt here on the farm with nothing but 5-6 balls, a strip of patching, and a priming horn of 3f in my pocket.
My thoughts have always been anything that I don’t have to do should be cut out and anything I don’t have to carry should be left at home.Also, as this subject is one of those that can get prickly, I will say, my entire focus has always been on finding a lube/patch/ball combo for each gun that doesn’t require swabbing between shots and that doesn’t leave hard crud and crud rings and also giving me no degradation of accuracy. I understand other lines of thinking are just as valid and work just as well as mine. My thoughts have always been anything that I don’t have to do should be cut out and anything I don’t have to carry should be left at home. I often squirrel hunt here on the farm with nothing but 5-6 balls, a strip of patching, and a priming horn of 3f in my pocket.
I once messed around for an afternoon with a 30 cal percussion and shot it quite a bit and even with it's rough bore I don't remember it fouling much, if any worse than my .45 cal rifle I had at the time. My guess is it has more to do with rifling pitch and depth than any thing else. I have been surprised in other guns as well that in some cases a slight to moderate rough bore didn't seem to make much if any difference in how much fouling built up.This has been brought up before. You'll get replies from people that say it does and those that say it doesn't so I suspect it's something about technique. My 32 for me seems to foul more. If I don't swab it about every 3rd shot, accuracy goes south quick. I don't usually swab my bigger calibers.
I hear this a lot, that calibers below .40 or thereabout foul much worse than the larger calibers in a rifle. Is this true at all?
My smooth bores seem to foul faster than my pea rifles.
Enter your email address to join: