I am embarking on my first ever hunting pouch make, and I’ve read T. C. Albert’s book entirely (Recreating the 18th Century Hunting Pouch).
The book has patterns in the back, and I’ve chosen the double pouch bag. I wanted it slightly larger so I set my photo copier to enlarge to 108%. After cutting out the patterns (paper) however I think something may be wrong with his pattern?? It appears like the double pouch pockets that would be the inside middle of the finished hunting pouch are about an inch wider than both the back body and the front body. Just to be certain that it was not my photocopying, I measured his actual patterns in the book and sure enough his pattern for the double pouch pocket body cuts are about an inch wider than his pattern for the back body and the front body.
Does anybody out there know if this is by design and I should cut the leather like this and then “bunch up” the pieces so that they bulge a bit in the middle? This book is a really fantastic resource and everybody recommends it so I find it hard to believe that I’m the first one to notice this pattern glitch if indeed it is a printing error.
Much obliged
The book has patterns in the back, and I’ve chosen the double pouch bag. I wanted it slightly larger so I set my photo copier to enlarge to 108%. After cutting out the patterns (paper) however I think something may be wrong with his pattern?? It appears like the double pouch pockets that would be the inside middle of the finished hunting pouch are about an inch wider than both the back body and the front body. Just to be certain that it was not my photocopying, I measured his actual patterns in the book and sure enough his pattern for the double pouch pocket body cuts are about an inch wider than his pattern for the back body and the front body.
Does anybody out there know if this is by design and I should cut the leather like this and then “bunch up” the pieces so that they bulge a bit in the middle? This book is a really fantastic resource and everybody recommends it so I find it hard to believe that I’m the first one to notice this pattern glitch if indeed it is a printing error.
Much obliged