maybe...,
As my degree is in anthropology, with emphasis on forensic archaeology, I am familiar that throughout the world, aboriginal people might or might not "entirely" use a kill. It's a myth that "They always used the whole animal wasting nothing". Single kills were normally consumed, yet there are reasons why they might not. The primary reason would be an excellent hunt in a short amount of time yielding several animals, for as there are only so many hands to process the "products" from the downed game, and only so many stomachs, thus if the full animal can't be processed before rotting set in..., you don't use the whole animal. This is true most often when going for really large animals such as moose, bison, elephant, giraffe, muskox, etc.
Back to the thread...
Legality is one thing..., ethics is another..., it's not illegal for the farmer to shoot a game animal on his property out of season with a crop damage permit, and allow it to rot. It's a huge waste though, and I'd say in my area where you could find folks with about a half day of phone calls who would come out and get the meat when it was shot.., unethical. Also, as a kid I saw a fellow illegally shoot a doe, but the people who got the meat badly needed the meat. Also illegal but I'd say not necessarily unethical. Now we can shoot does in many parts of the state as the deer herd is so huge here.
I think if you waste a harvested animal simply because you don't care, that's unethical.
I think "how" you hunt is aesthetics, and if you simple sit in the hot tub as in this
famous photo on the back porch and shoot them, or open the kitchen window and shoot them from inside the house as a feller in my town does..., you are really cheating yourself, it's ethical as the deer don't have to be in the back yard and can flee at any time, but please don't broadcast such methods to the locals as the PETA folks are out and about..., heck they were headquartered a block from where I am right now for many years. EGAD!
LD