At the time quite a ways. I was there for training.
Fast way to be asked to leave the range.
Navy likes to park their reactor school in Idaho so, if someone messes up, the worst damage you get are killer mutant potatoes...Ho swabby, how far from the coast were you stationed in Idaho?
The other is in upstate NY. Worked at both in my career. Not much is said about that one.Navy likes to park their reactor school in Idaho so, if someone messes up, the worst damage you get are killer mutant potatoes...
...those would really suck as horror movie monsters, you see.
French fries……?Navy likes to park their reactor school in Idaho so, if someone messes up, the worst damage you get are killer mutant potatoes...
...those would really suck as horror movie monsters, you see.
I'm failing to get the point of your entire post here,,,it's completely contrary to what we preach for safety (keep your booger-hook off the trigger) when shooting other types of firearms.
It just looks kind of cringy to me when I see someone holding a single action army with the hammer down and their finger outside the guard
That's not what I am saying at all. I'm specifically speaking of single action only revolvers that can only be fired if the hammer is cocked.I'm failing to get the point of your entire post here,
Are you saying safety protocol only matters sometimes(?) And/or somehow because it's "only" a cap and ball revolver that uses a different loading procedure that the gun in and of itself is absolved of safety protocol (?).
Guess what? Those that are around you at the range,, watch you. Your behavior, no matter what firearm you have in your hands, MATTERS to those around you.
Period!
Amen.My two bits: if you're going to follow a safety rule, you follow it 100% until it becomes automatic. Then you don't have to worry about whether you remembered to do it when it counts... keeping your finger outside the trigger guard on any sort of gun should basically be a muscle memory, with no thinking involved.
Not to mention that if you have your finger inside the trigger guard with the hammer down, it'll probably still be there when you pull the hammer back. Oops...
Oops, what? Of course my finger will be inside the guard when I cock the hammer because I'm ready to shoot before I would every cock that hammer. We're talking about single action only revolvers.My two bits: if you're going to follow a safety rule, you follow it 100% until it becomes automatic. Then you don't have to worry about whether you remembered to do it when it counts... keeping your finger outside the trigger guard on any sort of gun should basically be a muscle memory, with no thinking involved.
Not to mention that if you have your finger inside the trigger guard with the hammer down, it'll probably still be there when you pull the hammer back. Oops...
So you never, ever pause after you've pulled the hammer back? It's a hundred percent one-two action every single time, even if someone says something to you as you're cocking your gun?Oops, what? Of course my finger will be inside the guard when I cock the hammer because I'm ready to shoot before I would every cock that hammer. We're talking about single action only revolvers.
I know we are all trained to keep our finger off the trigger and outside the trigger guard for safety, especially on modern unmentionables. I've shot various single action revolvers for years, and since some of them are rather heavy, I've always picked them up with a finger inside the trigger guard. Often with my thumb against the hammer to boot. The gun won't fire until cocked, and pulling the trigger is necessary to lower the cocked hammer as part of the loading process so it always just felt natural.
I've never really thought about it, but via muscle memory, I handle a single action revolver completely different from how I handle a modern unmentionable. And it's completely contrary to what we preach for safety (keep your booger-hook off the trigger) when shooting other types of firearms. It just looks kind of cringy to me when I see someone holding a single action army with the hammer down and their finger outside the guard.
Well, that's an odd realm of intention,While facing a target I intend to engage,
I know we are all trained to keep our finger off the trigger and outside the trigger guard for safety, especially on modern unmentionables. I've shot various single action revolvers for years, and since some of them are rather heavy, I've always picked them up with a finger inside the trigger guard. Often with my thumb against the hammer to boot. The gun won't fire until cocked, and pulling the trigger is necessary to lower the cocked hammer as part of the loading process so it always just felt natural.
I've never really thought about it, but via muscle memory, I handle a single action revolver completely different from how I handle a modern unmentionable. And it's completely contrary to what we preach for safety (keep your booger-hook off the trigger) when shooting other types of firearms. It just looks kind of cringy to me when I see someone holding a single action army with the hammer down and their finger outside the guard.
I find it almost impossible to remain perfectly on aim whilst cocking. A neligent discharge (there is no such thing as an accident) will result, at best, with a poor score, or a miss. at worst? I dread to think. I scorn those who would advocate anything other than FINGER OUTOops, what? Of course my finger will be inside the guard when I cock the hammer because I'm ready to shoot before I would every cock that hammer. We're talking about single action only revolvers.
You would at our range and that is no question, no argument.I wouldn't do it simply to reinforce that habit of never putting your finger inside the trigger guard on any firearm until you are ready to fire.
Thank you for no longer living here.When I lived in the UK I genuinely felt an air of paranoia surrounding firearms,quite sad honestly.Quite a number of officious little twats chesting about trying to out do one another .
Enter your email address to join: