Congress Own Regiment
40 Cal.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2007
- Messages
- 311
- Reaction score
- 0
I have been on a quest to find info on guns of my ancestors. And it has been a frustrating one.
In trying to cross reference info. One stumbling block I run into is. Is there, or should I say was there back in the 1750's to 1770's a difference between names used to describe one weapon form the other. if it was made in one place or the other would it use a different name that today we lump in one category. for example one would fry in a pan and stew in a pot but we use the words interchangeably as layman and not as cooks.
The words fuzee and fusil appear in some of the text i read if they are to name the same weapon why would they use two different words.
could it be that they are closely used for the same type of weapon or back then did it have a more individual meaning? It would be very appreciated if any one with a opinion and or fact to help would please pass it on.
In trying to cross reference info. One stumbling block I run into is. Is there, or should I say was there back in the 1750's to 1770's a difference between names used to describe one weapon form the other. if it was made in one place or the other would it use a different name that today we lump in one category. for example one would fry in a pan and stew in a pot but we use the words interchangeably as layman and not as cooks.
The words fuzee and fusil appear in some of the text i read if they are to name the same weapon why would they use two different words.
could it be that they are closely used for the same type of weapon or back then did it have a more individual meaning? It would be very appreciated if any one with a opinion and or fact to help would please pass it on.