jethro224 said:
JD, I ain't pickin' sides here, but I gotta ask ya, Why not?
The Lyman barrels are good accurate barrels. Why buy another? The Lyman locks work good. They pop caps. Why buy another? You can get a nice stock and fit the parts you already own, file off the stampings in the barrel(or not), re-finish to your taste, and have a rifle that you built the way you like for just a couple hundred $ and a bit of work. A kit will cost easily 2 or 3 times the amount.
And you could still go shootin' in the meanwhile.
This is, of course, only since he already has the parts rifle. :v
I all depends on what someone is willing to settle for.
Hitting a cap placed on a brick with a hammer will make it pop, but will it make it pop in style? :winking:
GPR's are decent guns, and IMHO, probably the best value in factory guns. However, they have their flaws. One of those flaws is not enough drop in the butt, a too long of a length of pull for most people, and no cast off. That style of stock and buttplate is designed to be placed between the bicept and shoulder, as opposed to being placed in the pocket of the shoulder.
That style of stock needs at least 1/4 inch of cast off to allow the shooter to align the sights.
Another flaw is that the lock could be smoother, and in many cases, the hammer could line up better with the nipple.
The barrels are decent, but can be improved by lapping.
My only objection with spending a lot of money simply to change the appearance of any gun, no matter who made it, is that most people are not happy with the result.
I'm not above modifying any gun. I have modified every gun I have owned, to some extent, to improve funtion and accuracy. I have also refinished stocks and barrels, with varying results.
I have also spent more money than the law should allow on trying to make guns into something they can never be. And in the end, I have never been happy with the result.
A close friend owned a Dixie rifle many years ago.
He wsn't happy with the lock, so he replaced it, then the stock began to crack along the forearm and in the lock inlet. Instead of repairing the cracks, he bought another stock. Not long after, he decided the barrel was shot out. Instead of lapping the bore and cleaning up the crown, he replaced the barrel.
All of these replacements did nothing but cost him time effort and more money. They didn't improve the function or reliability of his gun one bit. Nor he didn't learn anything about tuning and repairing a lock, or how to lap a barrel, or how to repair those checks.
He sold that rifle twenty years ago, and he still looks back with regret at the time, effort and money he spent on that gun, for no good purpose.
J.D.