- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Messages
- 1,939
- Reaction score
- 2,187
I buy BP in bulk, usually 5 lbs or more at a time. Same with percussion caps. I am well stocked for quite a while.
Ok well I thought Goex was starting up again? This is still an issue?
Classic!Somehow, my mother-in-law had weaponized pea soup.
Over 50 pounds requires a magazine. I usually only have 30-40 pounds on hand at a time, but still keep it in a magazine made from an old refrigerator. Law requires the door not be locked, or latched. That makes it into a hell of a bomb. Magnetic closure works well.You are only allowed to own a limited quantity of BP, I believe max 50 lbs?
Antiques Travelers & Traders in Texas has caps & powder.I looked at Buffalo Arms, Grafs, Powder Inc....zero, nada , nothing!
It’s all legalese, which is way out of my understanding .Some of the posts here show just how easily the laws can be confused. Sorry I couldn't be of any help.
The USC 845 under Chapter 40 has exception 4) for small arms ammunition and components which is not shown in LD's posting of the law. It states as follows:
§845. Exceptions; relief from disabilities
(a) Except in the case of subsection (l), (m), (n), or (o) of section 842 and subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), and (i) of section 844 of this title, this chapter shall not apply to:
(4) small arms ammunition and components thereof;
(5) commercially manufactured black powder in quantities not to exceed fifty pounds, percussion caps, safety and pyrotechnic fuses, quills, quick and slow matches, and friction primers, intended to be used solely for sporting, recreational, or cultural purposes in antique firearms as defined in section 921(a)(16) of title 18 of the United States Code, or in antique devices as exempted from the term "destructive device" in section 921(a)(4) of title 18 of the United States Code;
Smokeless powder is classified as a propellant (NOT as an explosive): HAZMAT Division 4.1 (flammable solid material)Wise. Unfortunately for some, the trick is in how well and carefully they read it and understand it (and the other documents necessary for interpreting it correctly) -- and not try to cherry-pick parts out of it that they use to bolster their own odd beliefs. There's no shortage of other authoritative literature (from sources such as ATF and others) for anyone who really wants to learn the truth.
But if someone decides to read "exempts from regulation commercially manufactured black power" as "exempts from regulationcommercially manufacturedblack power", and stick with that because it suits their view of the world, then that's on them.
It's really important how carefully you read and how you express things. For example when you said
You said two things: (1) that you understood that BP is an explosive, and (2) that Smokeless is not.
But you're wrong: Smokeless IS an explosive -- as BP is.
Just to add a little more into the mix - from the ATF website. Knowing how the Feds are VERY particular about words, what does engaged in the business actually mean. They didn't say engaged in the act...AH but the rub there is the fact that it mentions black powder apart from small arms ammunition and components thereof.... NOTE the Very Next Entry which you quoted...
(5) commercially manufactured black powder in quantities not to exceed fifty pounds, percussion caps, safety and pyrotechnic fuses, quills, quick and slow matches, and friction primers, intended to be used solely for sporting, recreational, or cultural purposes in antique firearms as defined in section 921(a)(16) of title 18 of the United States Code, or in antique devices as exempted from the term "destructive device" in section 921(a)(4) of title 18 of the United States Code;
SO UNDER this, black powder because it is mentioned APART from "small arms ammunition and components thereof" it is therefore NOT considered covered under paragraph 4, otherwise it would be completely redundant, PLUS note that it is specifically written "commercially manufactured" which was my entire point..., IF it is not "commercially" manufactured..., i.e. home made, is NOT an exception.... or is it???.... you and I cannot tell....
LD
Nice try. But this is what I mean by cherry-picking and not paying attention to details. I'll grant you that the whole Hazmat approach in terms of "compatibility classes" is confusing to the average reader, but you should at least look at all that they have to say about smokeless powder (and the compatibility classes it falls in). As I've mentioned previously, confusion will result when something is talked about in one place in terms of its function (purpose) and in another place in terms of its chemistry and physics. If you aren't up to managing those distinctions, you shouldn't be playing this game. You apparently think that if something is a propellant, then it can't be an explosive, or if it's an explosive then it can't be a propellant. But you really need to rethink that view. Explosives, indeed, can (and are) used to propel things.Smokeless powder is classified as a propellant (NOT as an explosive): HAZMAT Division 4.1 (flammable solid material)
Black powder IS classified as an explosive: HAZMAT Division 1.1
Enter your email address to join: