- Joined
- Jul 24, 2018
- Messages
- 4,497
- Reaction score
- 5,647
Every single idea or theory I've ever had about historical Muzzleloading has been disproven by some evidence or writing that was found.Oh boy, now we're in it. I am a big fan of commonality. There was a loading block found with '1776" scribbled on it. EVIDENCE that loading blocks were used. I've also seen small "priming" horns. Did they actually hold "Priming" powder or were they just small horns for a day's shooting. Who knows?
I like the mountain man era and one thing I have found is a huge variety of rifles. Not a situation of Remington, or Winchester, or Ruger. Every firearm found seems to be a one of a kind item. YES there are some major makers that show up more often but the vast majority of firearms are these one of a kinds. Does that mean I support running off and making whatever you want and put it under a "one of a kind"? No, we ought to copy what was (IMHO) but there is a huge amount of unknowns. Try finding original pre-1800 pocket knives- not many.
So...back to your question. From my reading, it seems reloading was done MOST COMMONLY with the horn (not safe), same powder in the pan, and a "thumb" pressure to push in the ball- must have been a looser fit.
People will tell you that something never existed, like a rifled .69 Musket conversion that was left in Flintlock because the shop in the 1850's or 60's didn't have hammers and just wanted to fulfill the contract and deliver usable Muskets to the US Govt. and get paid. Historians are like "this never occurred" and then one will be found in a collection. But we still don't know if it wasn't re-converted back to Flint and anyone that does know died 130 years ago.
Lots of written history is flawed and much exaggeration occurs. We still don't know that Revolutionary War "sharpshooters" picked off British Officers at 600 yards with iron sight flintlock long rifles. Lots of these accounts are Fish Stories and a 200 yard shot becomes 3 country miles when the guy who was there writes home about it.
Most period people might not bother to write about short starters because it's mundane and they'd rather write about fighting off 70 Indians with a Tomahawk and hitting one at 500 paces with a pistol.
If books and movies are in any way historically accurate, not a one of the Last of the Mohicans armed with rifles was shown using a short starter and I've never seen one used in a movie, even ones that strive for accuracy. Hawkeye even talks about using silk to get an extra 40 yards out of his rifle but never once is a Short Starter shown.