ETipp, the Crockett .32 rifle is capable of that group size at 44 yards and maybe farther. Back when I could see a friend and I were shooting my .36 SMR at liter plastic soda bottles and the load was 20 grains of Jack's Battle Powder and the distance was 80 yards. I had no trouble hitting them where I wanted to hit once I accounted for the drop at that distance. Same goes for the fine little Crockett. I've never fired my .32 or .36 past 50 yards and mostly I set up targets at about 40 yards or a bit farther. And yes the Crockett is amazing.
I do try to keep my good targets but I also keep some of the "not-so-good" targets too. Doing that shows me that good vs bad days shoots can present useful information.
Indeed. I concur.
I'll have to take your word on the longer distances (target shooting) with the Crockett. Due to my vision I keep my shots at, or under, 30 yards on paper. I have made some longer shots on squirrels, however.
I have found that, without doubt, the little Crockett Rifle shoots much better than I can most of the time. Took me a while to figure it out, to the degree that I swore there was something wrong with that ML. Much of it had to do with shooting it from a bench. For whatever reason, it's still the most difficult rifle I have ever shot from a bench.
However, after a few good days here and there with very good accuracy, it became obvious. The rifle is very accurate, up to the task and is much more accurate than I am on a constant basis. What that did was build a fire under me and make me strive harder to figure it, which thankfully I did. I was just about to give up on it.
That has been my point in this thread, but there are those that still try to argue it.
Not a competition shooter, no desire whatsoever to be one. Just a hard core hunter that takes hunting very serious.