Measures land to land .528 inch. Ball is .532 and 50 grains of ffg. Patches are blown through, but not really cut by the rifling. My mentor suggested we try cornmeal and a thinner, maybe tee-shirt patch.Land to land, I'd leave the muzzle alone until you see if it is cutting patches...Once you determine the bore and have a mold, load a ball with a strip of ticking about 12 inches long and then pull it out...Look at the ticking and see if it is cut...
Barrel channel stock seems very old and no new wood has been changed.It looks like there is a couple of nicks in the muzzle that could cause cutting of the patch when loading. Have a gunsmith crown it if you don't know how. It looks like the barrel channel was filled in with a chunk of wood and a different barrel installed. I have a couple of half stock originals that have mixed parts from back in the day. Can you post pictures of the rest of the gun?
It could be choke bored, not real unusual. That muzzle does need some work. As far as affecting collector value, that is a separate issue I am not qualified to speak to.the ball is harder to start for about the first 7 few inches, then gets easier.
That is a nice gun. Side view of the Nose cap explains it all. Be very careful on crowning the muzzle, maybe just enough to take out the nicks.Barrel channel stock seems very old and no new wood has been changed.
To my untrained eye there seems a few nicks in the muzzle.
Personally I would not be personally crowning the muzzle. I will get the right person to do this.That is a nice gun. Side view of the Nose cap explains it all. Be very careful on crowning the muzzle, maybe just enough to take out the nicks.
Seems like that would be mighty hard to load.I guess the muzzle at .528 land to land and a patch of .018 over muzzle would equate to .036 plus .528 would be .564.
I will try these. I have a mentor that has a lot of molds, and we will keep trying to make it right.Seems like that would be mighty hard to load.
A thinner patch might help but your ball is still larger than your bore, albeit only .004".
My first thought is try a .520" ball, or even .515".
I have a percussion rifle with a .532" bore that I shoot .520" balls out of.
For hunting, .012" patch lubed with mink oil. I have shot this load up to 12 times without swabbing.
For target, a .015" patch lubed with moose milk will shoot all day without swabbing.
Measuring patch thickness is another thing to get hung up on.
The .012" patches I use are are labeled as .015" and the .015" are labeled .018".
There are multiple ways to measure patch thicknesses. I just have a way of doing it that I feel consistent with so when I go to the fabric store with my micrometer I can get what I need.
I have not the slightest intention to modify the gun. It is a matter of finding the right ball and patch.Someone put a LOT of love into that rifle when it was being built, look at the detailed work in the side view of the muzzle, gorgeous! I'd exhaust all possibilities on finding a load before I modified the gun. It seems to me, too, that the ball is too large, a .520" should be about right, with some thinner patching. Experiment with your load components before you mod the gun!
Good ..... Best of luck budI have not the slightest intention to modify the gun. It is a matter of finding the right ball and patch.
Enter your email address to join: