And I, for more than the sake of argument, will go the other way.
Zouaves are far more comfortable for the typical American shooter, as the stock comb has greater drop and thus puts one's face in better "natural" alignment with the sights. Enfields have higher combs, requiring either that you burrow your cheek into the wood, or try to line your face up much further back on the stock than most people find practicable.
Further, the Zouave that my son shoots in the N-SSA, with its Numrich Arms barrel, takes 37 grians of 3f and turns it into cloverleafs printed with a Lyman 575213 old style bullet at 50 yards.
My best advice is, heft both rifles repeatedly. See if your face fits the Enfield stock. I'd almost bet it won't. Zouaves are generally well-made, generally accurate and generally less expensive than Enfields.
As far as triggers and sights, you'll need some custom work whichever way you go. Makers seem to like 12-pound trigger pulls, and repro sights all leave minies printing high and (generally) left.
If you find you like this minie-shooting thing, drop on by the N-SSA web site (link in the links section of this bb) and see what it is we do with these CW muzzlestuffers. I haven't yet seen the sport to match it. :blue: :grey: :imo: