What I consider my go to reliable dealer said his distibutor told him by june he will have goex. I told him lets have a launch party.
I see what you did there. ; )
What I consider my go to reliable dealer said his distibutor told him by june he will have goex. I told him lets have a launch party.
Your posts encouraged me to revisit T7. So far it’s encouraging. Cleanup is quick and easy, I can keep a 36 Remington running through a few cylinders without windex or anything else. Just load and shoot.Hopefully all the Fudds won't max out their credit cards and buy every can of Goex up when it hits distributors
Honestly, even though I have access to Schuetzen , I'm becoming a huge fan of 777 for some of my revolvers. As long as there's something to burn , we'll be OK.
CCI getting caps out is a bigger concern for me
I honestly am loving 777 more and more . It's consistent and accurate .Your posts encouraged me to revisit T7. So far it’s encouraging. Cleanup is quick and easy, I can keep a 36 Remington running through a few cylinders without windex or anything else. Just load and shoot.
Thankfully we have SchuetzenIf you read that update just above, that ADK Bigfoot posted, the US Military is THE largest purchaser of black powdah. It is used as the core charge to detonate the shells in the large cannons and Howitzers, the 155mm where most of the stock in the world is headed to Ukraine.
As that article clearly points out, for the US it is a "sole source" provider plant ... ouch! As such, Estes made the decision to acquire it to keep their core bizness alive ... I certainly undertand that.
Also, recreational shooters are most likely a small % of their business and very avid shooters that use up 100s of pounds a year are a very very small %If you read that update just above, that ADK Bigfoot posted, the US Military is THE largest purchaser of black powdah. It is used as the core charge to detonate the shells in the large cannons and Howitzers, the 155mm where most of the stock in the world is headed to Ukraine.
As that article clearly points out, for the US it is a "sole source" provider plant ... ouch! As such, Estes made the decision to acquire it to keep their core bizness alive ... I certainly undertand that.
Number 2 is my big question. With the shortage, and all of us online talking about it, my big ole' gut tells me it will double what it was before.I only have two questions,
1. Is it the same "original" Goex powder or a new blend ?
2. How much is it going to cost ?
I may have to give in and get myself an Old Army, given that I pretty much got rid of everything non-Ruger in my handgun collectionI honestly am loving 777 more and more . It's consistent and accurate .
I've been shooting pounds of this stuff a month ,I started buying it for rifles but it's become more of my favorite for revolvers recently
I have a healthy stock of Real Black but 777 really shines in my "medium frame" .36 and .44 revolvers
I put 100 rounds each through a pair of my Pietta .44 Navies using 777 "2f" and all I had to do was occasionally put a drop of liquid blackpowder patch lube on the arbor in front of the cylinder along with using lubed wads. But I have run them without wads with 777 too. No need to break guns down
777 is locally accessible and it burns clean, being an avid "unmentionable " Ruger revolver fan and as someone who often brings both cartridge and percussion thumb busters or DA's to the range, I've become an "impure purist" and 777 just lets me shoot more without fiddling with dirty guns.
It really is kind of a "semi smokeless"
The only thing is 777 leaves the chambers crustier aka "the crud ring" but it's nothing 5 minutes with a nylon brush at home after a range day won't fix
It may well be, but I suspect Estes will survey the market and bring it in at market price. Now what the Retilers sell it for is another issue altogether. I am happily shooting Swiss but will support a US based manufacture for sure.Number 2 is my big question. With the shortage, and all of us online talking about it, my big ole' gut tells me it will double what it was before.
I’ve noticed a bit stiffer loading at times (loading bullets, balls load just fine)I honestly am loving 777 more and more . It's consistent and accurate .
I've been shooting pounds of this stuff a month ,I started buying it for rifles but it's become more of my favorite for revolvers recently
I have a healthy stock of Real Black but 777 really shines in my "medium frame" .36 and .44 revolvers
I put 100 rounds each through a pair of my Pietta .44 Navies using 777 "2f" and all I had to do was occasionally put a drop of liquid blackpowder patch lube on the arbor in front of the cylinder along with using lubed wads. But I have run them without wads with 777 too. No need to break guns down
777 is locally accessible and it burns clean, being an avid "unmentionable " Ruger revolver fan and as someone who often brings both cartridge and percussion thumb busters or DA's to the range, I've become an "impure purist" and 777 just lets me shoot more without fiddling with dirty guns.
It really is kind of a "semi smokeless"
The only thing is 777 leaves the chambers crustier aka "the crud ring" but it's nothing 5 minutes with a nylon brush at home after a range day won't fix
I gave up on 777 in my Ruger Old Army and my Dad's old T/C Hawken. I forget why I didn't like it in the T/C....accuracy maybe....its been a while. However, in my ROA I could detect two distinct ignitions. Sorta like a poorly set up flintlock but not nearly as bad. But still it was there and noticeable. Given your experience with 777 maybe you can explain what I was observing. My only guess is I was hearing the cap after which 777 ignited.I honestly am loving 777 more and more . It's consistent and accurate .
I've been shooting pounds of this stuff a month ,I started buying it for rifles but it's become more of my favorite for revolvers recently
I have a healthy stock of Real Black but 777 really shines in my "medium frame" .36 and .44 revolvers
I put 100 rounds each through a pair of my Pietta .44 Navies using 777 "2f" and all I had to do was occasionally put a drop of liquid blackpowder patch lube on the arbor in front of the cylinder along with using lubed wads. But I have run them without wads with 777 too. No need to break guns down
777 is locally accessible and it burns clean, being an avid "unmentionable " Ruger revolver fan and as someone who often brings both cartridge and percussion thumb busters or DA's to the range, I've become an "impure purist" and 777 just lets me shoot more without fiddling with dirty guns.
It really is kind of a "semi smokeless"
The only thing is 777 leaves the chambers crustier aka "the crud ring" but it's nothing 5 minutes with a nylon brush at home after a range day won't fix
The nipples were probably bad? Or the 777 was compressed TOO much. I compress it but my 30 grain charge and a wad doesn't need to be forced. 777 doesn't seem to like high compression when loaded. This is why 777 is popular for cartridges, it needs just a firm seating , not a crushing.I gave up on 777 in my Ruger Old Army and my Dad's old T/C Hawken. I forget why I didn't like it in the T/C....accuracy maybe....its been a while. However, in my ROA I could detect two distinct ignitions. Sorta like a poorly set up flintlock but not nearly as bad. But still it was there and noticeable. Given your experience with 777 maybe you can explain what I was observing. My only guess is I was hearing the cap after which 777 ignited.
As far as shooting cap and ball revolvers using BP, I have no problem firing my ROA "all day" without cleaning any part of the gun. Usable accuracy exists for as long as I am shooting. Typically I shoot 6-8 cylinders at informal targets while roaming around the desert. As an aside I surely don't waste caps "clearing out nipples" at any stage of my shooting. Some literature recommends doing that.
Reason for trying 777 in the ROA I was told I could get higher velocities. Out of curiosity I compared 777 to 3F Swiss. 35grs by volume of both powders.
777 958-1021 mean 990 6 shots 3 F Swiss 1049-1087 mean 1070 12 shots 2F Swiss 961-1002 mean 984 6 shots. Maybe compressed 777 would have been higher....no idea. Test was 20 May 2013.
Nipple malfunction seems possible. I was using TRESCO (? is that it). Excellent one for BP and all my C&B revolvers have them. But maybe not good for 777. Based on your experience compression seems like a good theory as well. Thanks.The nipples were probably bad? Or the 777 was compressed TOO much. I compress it but my 30 grain charge and a wad doesn't need to be forced. 777 doesn't seem to like high compression when loaded. This is why 777 is popular for cartridges, it needs just a firm seating , not a crushing.
I've used the stock nipples for a couple 100 and the SlixShots for 100s more, with CCI #11 non-magnums and 777 2f
I've never had anything but instant ignition with 777 in my revolvers
In my Zouave that I used 777 in , a few times I had the boomBOOM ignition and I was most likely packing the Minie too tight on the 777
Thanks for posting this interesting article! Kudos! (Or hoo-rah if you're a Marine!)Here is an update on Estes.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-u-...wi390zdy52a&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
ADK Bigfoot
Enter your email address to join: