kwlskeeter
Pilgrim
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2013
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi everyone (sorry to be so wordy!!)
I have been hunting my whole life but am new to black-powder firearms. I have always wanted one. This forum is excellent (!) and have learned a lot in a couple of days. There is more to this than I realized! I am excited to get into hunting with my first "smoke pole"... which will need to be an over-the-counter one for now... as I just don't have time nor talent probably to start assembling my own.
SO: Idaho has embraced "traditional" rules, which I think is great. I even got ahead of myself a bit, and applied for a pronghorn controlled hunt with the rifle I do not yet own (and drew a tag). I DO have time to buy this rifle and practice and become proficient with it.
Here is my question: Idaho shows two pictures of "open ignition" on their web-page. Here is the link which describes the required weapon; basically saying on page 88:
Equipped with an ignition system in which any portion of the cap is exposed or visible when the weapon is cocked and ready to fire.
http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/public/docs/rules/bgRules.pdf
The link to "more information" repeats the rules but shows TWO pictures of such an open igntion...
http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/public/hunt/rules/?getPage=299
But... I am a bit concerned about the exposed "hammer" on most traditional guns. It would seem to me (newbie) that the second picture they show has no exposed hammer which might get hung up on clothes, tree branches, car doors, etc
I have been to a few stores and have not seen any such "exposed" ignition systems like the one if the photo. In fact, even finding "traditional" BP rifles is proving to be harder than I thought. Bass Pro Shops, for example, had ONE of about 10.
I guess the bottom line is that I am looking for the best first rifle... lots of bang for the buck. I have read other threads on this subject, but none that I saw addressed these two types of open ignitions (pros and cons).
We CAN use percussion caps and musket caps and I think I like this idea over taking a lot of time to ensure my flint striker is bomb-proof.
Let me boil this down to my thoughts/needs (AGAIN: newbie!!)
I like the "caps" idea over flint-lock (cannot use 209)
I like the "in-line" concept but again, must be "open" style. Open to feedback here!
I think I prefer a longer rifle over a shorter one? Antelope are spooky!
I do plan on shooting PRBs, so 1-66 twist? I plan to hunt mostly and I keep reading that they are the best "all-around" ammo. I will target-shoot for practice, but don't see any benefit to getting into conical or other fancy bullets (I love the idea of making my own RBs some-day).
I will only buy a .50 cal as I also drew a no-brainer doe hunt as well as a late cow-elk tag. I might try to use the smoke-pole for all three hunts (Idaho requires .50 for elk). I am a meat hunter this year.
OK, enough for now!!
Thoughts PLEASE??? (if you are still reading, I am amazed!!
I have been hunting my whole life but am new to black-powder firearms. I have always wanted one. This forum is excellent (!) and have learned a lot in a couple of days. There is more to this than I realized! I am excited to get into hunting with my first "smoke pole"... which will need to be an over-the-counter one for now... as I just don't have time nor talent probably to start assembling my own.
SO: Idaho has embraced "traditional" rules, which I think is great. I even got ahead of myself a bit, and applied for a pronghorn controlled hunt with the rifle I do not yet own (and drew a tag). I DO have time to buy this rifle and practice and become proficient with it.
Here is my question: Idaho shows two pictures of "open ignition" on their web-page. Here is the link which describes the required weapon; basically saying on page 88:
Equipped with an ignition system in which any portion of the cap is exposed or visible when the weapon is cocked and ready to fire.
http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/public/docs/rules/bgRules.pdf
The link to "more information" repeats the rules but shows TWO pictures of such an open igntion...
http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/public/hunt/rules/?getPage=299
But... I am a bit concerned about the exposed "hammer" on most traditional guns. It would seem to me (newbie) that the second picture they show has no exposed hammer which might get hung up on clothes, tree branches, car doors, etc
I have been to a few stores and have not seen any such "exposed" ignition systems like the one if the photo. In fact, even finding "traditional" BP rifles is proving to be harder than I thought. Bass Pro Shops, for example, had ONE of about 10.
I guess the bottom line is that I am looking for the best first rifle... lots of bang for the buck. I have read other threads on this subject, but none that I saw addressed these two types of open ignitions (pros and cons).
We CAN use percussion caps and musket caps and I think I like this idea over taking a lot of time to ensure my flint striker is bomb-proof.
Let me boil this down to my thoughts/needs (AGAIN: newbie!!)
I like the "caps" idea over flint-lock (cannot use 209)
I like the "in-line" concept but again, must be "open" style. Open to feedback here!
I think I prefer a longer rifle over a shorter one? Antelope are spooky!
I do plan on shooting PRBs, so 1-66 twist? I plan to hunt mostly and I keep reading that they are the best "all-around" ammo. I will target-shoot for practice, but don't see any benefit to getting into conical or other fancy bullets (I love the idea of making my own RBs some-day).
I will only buy a .50 cal as I also drew a no-brainer doe hunt as well as a late cow-elk tag. I might try to use the smoke-pole for all three hunts (Idaho requires .50 for elk). I am a meat hunter this year.
OK, enough for now!!
Thoughts PLEASE??? (if you are still reading, I am amazed!!