Interesting info from the Lewis and Clark expedition

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I keep thinking I'll give it a try next time I'm out. I wouldn't pound one onto my bore, but whittled down to a loose fit with a couple over powder cards and a felt wad should be just fine. I'm sure it will tumble end for end, but short range I bet I could scare a rabbit. I do usually carry a smooth bore, but I don't think it would matter.
Heck, guys shove grass, leaves, and hornets nest down the tube. A stick is the next logical progression in technology!
Justin.P, if you do, please keep us posted.
 
I saw a guy in basic training, had accidently stuck mud in the flash hider of his M-14, when he shot it, the "fingers" of the hider were splayed out just like a Bugs Bunny/Elmer Fudd cartoon! (1960's, the M-14's were semi-auto only in basic.) I don't think they made a big deal out of it, it was simply an educational accident! BTW, that the L&C Expedition did all that, and lost no guys in the doing, is amazing! They were all Army, so maybe that was to their advantage; were used to some organized discipline.
Wish I could tell you mine was an accident 🙄, more of "let's see what will happen if.....". Yeah, I was a knucklehead.
 
Curiosity got the better of me... I tried pieces of green boxelder branch. Once or twice just a snug fit to the bore, and twice more slightly smaller with a patch. Used 30 grains 2F. Enough power to completely penetrate both sides of a large cardboard box. Plenty enough to kill a rabbit... if you can hit it. Closest I came to the bull was about 4 inches away. This was off hand around 15 yards. Yes, they were tumbling.

20240107_135149.jpg
20240107_135154.jpg
20240107_135437.jpg
20240107_141248.jpg
 
Curiosity got the better of me... I tried pieces of green boxelder branch. Once or twice just a snug fit to the bore, and twice more slightly smaller with a patch. Used 30 grains 2F. Enough power to completely penetrate both sides of a large cardboard box. Plenty enough to kill a rabbit... if you can hit it. Closest I came to the bull was about 4 inches away. This was off hand around 15 yards. Yes, they were tumbling.

View attachment 283292View attachment 283293View attachment 283294View attachment 283295

Maybe a whole handful of sticks would increase the odds a bit!
That's exactly how I suspected it would go, it would be just dumb luck if you could actually hit anything. But dumb luck is better than no luck when you ain't got any lead.
 
A huge thank you to Adam in WI!!! OK, here we go . . . Would the accuracy improve if the patch was lubed with genuine sperm whale oil or saliva from a mermaid? Would a maple tree branch trump boxelder? Would 21.3 gr of the "new" Goex be the ticket to one hole accuracy? We'll never know unless Adam, or some other daring guy, jumps in the deep end. Seriously, thanks, Adam!
 
In early 1970's , when Pennies dept store had a sportings good dept , they sold H+A underhammer percussion rifles in .45 cal. . My inventive buddy , used to load junk practice arrows into the H+A underhammer , and shoot them for fun. The feathers would be blasted off , but I don't remember anything about accuracy. Probably rabbits at close range would work.
 
Just another thought....
I don't know if old George Shannon had any patch material left. But if the ground wasn't to frozen or the snow to deep, I can't help but wonder if a "slug" of sand or dirt tied up in some ticking might be more accurate than a stick.
I know it's too dark now Adam, but let us know at first light how it works, ok? :)
 
I wonder why he just didn't use some stones/pebbles?

Did the original source claim he had a rifle? I thought a majority of arms at that point were smooth bore. If it wasn't a rifle, small pebbles would've absolutely been my first choice. I'm sure enough leaves, grass, hide would've been available for wadding.
 
Just another thought....
I don't know if old George Shannon had any patch material left. But if the ground wasn't to frozen or the snow to deep, I can't help but wonder if a "slug" of sand or dirt tied up in some ticking might be more accurate than a stick.
I know it's too dark now Adam, but let us know at first light how it works, ok? :)
Oooh good idea.
 
Did the original source claim he had a rifle? I thought a majority of arms at that point were smooth bore. If it wasn't a rifle, small pebbles would've absolutely been my first choice. I'm sure enough leaves, grass, hide would've been available for wadding.
What were the arms carried by L&C?

1803 Harper's Ferry's?
 
I'm reading the Journal of Lewis and Clark. Haven't seen that in the book, yet. Knowing about the existence of the air rifle they carried is the reason I began the book.
 
Back
Top