I don't want to get into a discussion of using a range rod at the bench. I've always liked to load my rifles like I would in the field. That means using the ramrod that comes with the rifle.
With that said, most of my experience with muzzle-loading rifles has been with the muskets using metal ramrods. I also use a muzzle protector on the metal ramrod to prevent wear on the rifling.
Years ago, I did have some muzzle loaders with wooden ramrods but, unfortunately, had to be sold.
Back in the day I heard that fiberglass ramrods were bad for a muzzle-loader's rifling. So that's why I never used them. However, I was always nervous using the wooden version. I don't like the idea of one breaking in my hand, even though I grasped it close to the muzzle during the loading process.
So what I'd like to know is that since fiberglass ramrods have been around for several decades, has experience shown that to be true? Does the fiberglass material erode the rifling at the muzzle?
With that said, most of my experience with muzzle-loading rifles has been with the muskets using metal ramrods. I also use a muzzle protector on the metal ramrod to prevent wear on the rifling.
Years ago, I did have some muzzle loaders with wooden ramrods but, unfortunately, had to be sold.
Back in the day I heard that fiberglass ramrods were bad for a muzzle-loader's rifling. So that's why I never used them. However, I was always nervous using the wooden version. I don't like the idea of one breaking in my hand, even though I grasped it close to the muzzle during the loading process.
So what I'd like to know is that since fiberglass ramrods have been around for several decades, has experience shown that to be true? Does the fiberglass material erode the rifling at the muzzle?