Harry Marinakis
40 Cal
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2021
- Messages
- 259
- Reaction score
- 538
There is international scientific consensus on the dangers of lead ammunition.
In Merchants of Doubt, Oreskes and Conway (2010) showed how denial of scientific evidence has been a strategy used by those with vested interests in important health and environmental issues such as climate change, tobacco smoking, ozone layer thinning, acid rain, and DDT. The ongoing discussion on the use of lead-based ammunition parallels the debates covered by Oreskes and Conway. Thus, extensive scientific evidence is disputed or rejected, lead substitutes developed by the ammunition industries are deemed inadequate or too expensive, and proposed bans on lead ammunition are often viewed as anti-hunting.
I got so much lead on my back yard 300-yd shooting range that I'm screwed.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161761/
In Merchants of Doubt, Oreskes and Conway (2010) showed how denial of scientific evidence has been a strategy used by those with vested interests in important health and environmental issues such as climate change, tobacco smoking, ozone layer thinning, acid rain, and DDT. The ongoing discussion on the use of lead-based ammunition parallels the debates covered by Oreskes and Conway. Thus, extensive scientific evidence is disputed or rejected, lead substitutes developed by the ammunition industries are deemed inadequate or too expensive, and proposed bans on lead ammunition are often viewed as anti-hunting.
I got so much lead on my back yard 300-yd shooting range that I'm screwed.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161761/