Greenmtnboy
62 Cal.
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2005
- Messages
- 2,582
- Reaction score
- 12
Dan Phariss said:Greenmtnboy said:flintlock62 said:I agree with pure, soft lead. One of the exceptions is using 000 buck in my .36 caliber rifle. The antimony makes lead somewhat harder, but I have no problem pushing it down the barrel. Shooting squirrel does not require much expansion.
exactly,
All tho I stopped shooting buck shot out of my Greenmtnbarrels because I couldn't get the hard ball to abturate enough to engage the rifling and accuracy was not good enough for consistent head shoots on bunnies out to 75 yrds.
:thumbsup:
If the buckshot would not shoot its likely a fitment problem. But one never knows. Usually accuracy problems are from a too small ball or too thin patch. It might just be that the barrel does not like the diameter. Also a good cast ball will out shoot swaged balls and likely buckshot as well. So it may not the the alloy.
Balls cast from harder alloys, for example, may require a thinner patch than lead balls from the same mould since they cast larger than pure lead. I shoot a .015 linen for WW alloy in my 16 bore rifle and .020 ticking for lead. The accuracy is identical as near as I can tell and if I had to choose I would likely take WW for accuracy.
Dan
When it comes to shallow grooves like on commercial guns I agree but when you are talking about .010 to .012 deep grooves in a Greenmtnbarrel or a Rice barrel, even with a .030 canvas patch and .010 under ball or a .020 canvas patch and a .005 under ball the hard balls were not engaging the rifling enough to get what I would term acceptable hunting accuracy.
I tried this is 45,50, and 54 cal rifles.
with custom barrels. :thumbsup: