- Joined
- Sep 3, 2013
- Messages
- 156
- Reaction score
- 89
I would like to see that also
I have many sides of veg tan in various thicknesses, and plenty of leather dyes. I'm wondering if there is a better leather choice that would be more historically accurate than veg tan.
I'm probably misremembering the name but wasn't there another leather (that I recall a quote about being used for at least one shot pouch) called something like, "red Russia leather? I think it was tanned with fish oils maybe?Hi Harry,
There is another historically accurate leather than plain veg/bark tan and that is still available today. It can be better for making shot pouches/hunting bags, if it suits your needs.
Prior to and during the 18th/early 19th centuries Tanners took some veg/bark tanned leather and after the tanning process was done, made them into "Oil/Oyl Stufft" or "Oil/Oyl Stuff'd" (Oil Stuffed in modern spelling) leather. This was is/an added processing where they may or may not have dyed the leather FIRST and then they worked oils and waxes into the leather.
Working oils and waxes into the leather made the leather more resistant to water/weather damage for leather that would be used to make things often/usually used outdoors.
Doddridge tells us that every frontier cabin (mid 18th century) had their own tanning pit that frontier settlers used to "bark tan" or "veg tan" leather using bark from trees (like oak, willow or douglas fir) that have a lot of natural tannin in them. Those settlers may or may not have used natural plant dyes to dye the leather or may have just used the leather "as is" and got a light tan to slightly brown "russet" color.
Now you DO NOT want to buy just any "Oil Tan/Tanned" leather on the market today to recreate using period "Oyl Stufft" leather. Again as a reminder that "Oil Tan" is a process done after tanning, so for example you should ask if the leather was veg tanned because that is what you want. You DO NOT want Oil Tan / Chrome tanned leather as chrome tanning did not come out until after our period.
You also DO NOT want Oil Tan leather that they embossed or rolled in rolling dyes to make a uniform surface texture on the smooth side of the leather. (I was disappointed a while back that one kind of Oil Tan/Veg tanned leather Tandy stocked and I really liked the weight and temper of the leather, had this rolled embossed surface texture, so I didn't buy it for historic repro's.)
I was also surprised the first time I bought Oil Tan/Veg tanned leather that the thickness of the leather is or at least can be DIFFERENT from the same oz weight of veg tanned leather, which did not at first make sense to me and I found Oil Tan leather to be THINNER than the same oz weight in veg tanned.
As an example of this, the first Oil Tan hide I looked at was a 3-4 oz weight that some folks prefer for a shot pouch/hunting bag when using Veg Tan, BUT when I actually felt the temper (how much it bends and stretches) of the leather - I thought it would be too thin to stand up to going through brambles and thick branches. I much preferred the 4-5 oz weight in Oil Tan that was about the same thickness as 3-4 oz in veg tan. Heck, I have felt some 5-7 oz Oil Tan that was perfect and some that was a bit too thick and that brings up the importance of you feeling the temper of the leather in person (if you can) or at least asking for or offering to pay a little bit for some samples of leather you are trying to decide about before you buy.
OK, so why is the difference in thickness by oz weight between Veg tanned and Oil Tan leather? Well, supposedly way back in time they came up with the oz or ounce weight of leather by cutting one foot squares of leather and may or may not have soaked the squares in water and then weighed the foot squares of leather. The thicker the leather, the more it weighed and thus the higher oz weight. OK, so when they worked oils and waxes into the leather to make them "Oyl Stufft," that made each thickness weigh more than Veg Tan at the same thickness without the added oils and waxes. Now I hope this explanation is not confusing, but the real "take away" on this is don't be surprised that Oil Tan leather is not the same thickness as common Veg Tan leather.
One thing I think is GREAT about Oil Tan for our use in creating historic replica's is when you buy many types of less expensive Oil Tan that are fine to excellent for our purpose, is it often does not come out in a "perfect uniform color." Now I know that more expensive commercial leathers made even during the period, could and did come out in an almost perfect uniform color. However, if a period settler tanned leather in his own tanning pit and then "Oyl Stufft" it, OR if got a period commercially tanned hide from many tanners in the colonies, the leather would not or at least may not have that "perfect uniform color."
More on Veg tanned leather in my next post.
Gus
PS Sorry, forgot to add this above. The only "bad" thing about Oil Tan leather outside it's slightly higher price is that you take whatever color you can get because with the oils and waxes worked into it, it is very difficult to impossible to change the color by staining/dyeing it later.
Yes there was, known as "Russia Leather" and it was probably the most expensive leather back then or now, other than for exotic stuff of course. It was tanned with willow bark and then oil stuffed with birch oil.I'm probably misremembering the name but wasn't there another leather (that I recall a quote about being used for at least one shot pouch) called something like, "red Russia leather? I think it was tanned with fish oils maybe?
Yup, that's what I was thinking of. Someone here sometime back got his hands on some I believe original leather that was recovered from a wreck or some such a while back.Yes there was, known as "Russia Leather" and it was probably the most expensive leather back then or now, other than for exotic stuff of course. It was tanned with willow bark and then oil stuffed with birch oil.
More info:
https://blog.library.si.edu/blog/2023/01/18/russia-leather/
Someone recently claims to have rediscovered the tanning process.
https://www.jfjbaker.co.uk/russian-leather
I did not mention it as it has got to be far too expensive for most of us to use.
Gus
Info on that wreck was at the bottom of one of my links, I think the Smithsonian one.Yup, that's what I was thinking of. Someone here sometime back got his hands on some I believe original leather that was recovered from a wreck or some such a while back.