She’s beautiful sir……very nice
I know this might sound trival, but is there a need for a left hand shooter to have a left side mounted lock?
Only time I would not shoot a righty is a side hammer mule ear. I think those caps sprays would get you with the face on the side and I would not put a deflector on it for looks purposes. Top side percussion or flintlock no issues what so ever.No!!!
YES ! We spend our samolians we should get the same service & items to fit us !No!!!
I think the better question to be asked would be, why do so many right handed people in the shooting community feel compelled to dictate to the left handed people what they need. It's almost as if a lefty having a lefty rifle offends them somehow. Stupid, just stupid.YES ! We spend our samolians we should get the same service & items to fit us !
You sir are correct , Sam Colt may have been LH'd. That is another problem with RH'd ML's. A lefty still has to use their LH to do all the cap install or prime the pan n so on. Its backwards to us, its not comfortable n LH'd people are treated as a lower class. A business stand point of ML's if they are a small Company, is very little profit. LH'd people are not in a large quantity.In some respects, it almost seems as if percussion revolvers are designed for a left-handed shooter. All the loading functions are done with the revolver in the left hand and when done, the revolver is transferred to the right hand. Not a major inconvenience to be sure. Of course, the argument can be made that the left hand is there as the loading fixture for the use of more dexterous tasks of pouring the powder, loading the ball and inserting the caps. Once loaded the right hand takes the revolver from the loading fixture to be shot.
I am going to nit pick here ! LH firearms have a higher resale because they are very hard to find !My BIL is left handed but he always bought right handed bolt guns and flintlocks. Why? Resale.
In some respects, it almost seems as if percussion revolvers are designed for a left-handed shooter. All the loading functions are done with the revolver in the left hand and when done, the revolver is transferred to the right hand. Not a major inconvenience to be sure. Of course, the argument can be made that the left hand is there as the loading fixture for the use of more dexterous tasks of pouring the powder, loading the ball and inserting the caps. Once loaded the right hand takes the revolver from the loading fixture to be shot.
"Pride" is why most of us buy your products, some (like me) would be proud to own a proper, left-handed example of at least one of your designs. Refusing to consider 10% of your potential customer base and even going so far as to insult them is a poor business move.
Depends on whether we're talking about rifles (the issue here is cast on/off) or smooth bores, which are mostly trade gun reproductions and military muskets, with straight stocks. I'm deliberately omitting bespoke double barrel guns because...well, they're bespoke.I know this might sound trivial, but is there a need for a left hand shooter to have a left side mounted lock?
Hence, the production rifle is ambidextrous in design. It isn't the side the lock is mounted on, it's stock architecture.
I see your remark on the WR having alot of cast in stock for RH'd shooters. That is a Bummer for me then, its tough enough for me to shoot RH'd ML's. Oh well i wish James Kibler the best on his Company.I have an SMR and a Woodsrunner. Both fit me just fine on the left side. The WR even has significant cast in the wrong direction, but I can't tell it from bringing it up to my face and straight back into my shoulder, it just fits.
I built a left-handed gun, it's okay but the lock sucks. Really good left-handed locks are hard to find so I bought from one of the usual suspects. The next time I built a gun from a board it wore a Kibler lock because it doesn't make a rat's behind which side the lock is on as far as shooting goes.
According to a Colt revolver book I have, it is pretty certain that Sam Colt was at least left eye dominant and shot his revolvers left handed. He was also a megalomaniac and it was only natural that he wouldn't give a speckled damn about anyone else's inconvenience handling his creations. He also nearly ruined his company by making the historically stupid decision of refusing Rollin White's patent offer, but that's another story.
And to Mr. Kibler, it's your business and you run it how you need to to remain profitable. I hope your investments eventually make you a pile of money, you have earned it. However, if the tables were turned and YOU were left handed, or born with some other handicap, your attitude toward others like that would be very different. "Pride" is why most of us buy your products, some (like me) would be proud to own a proper, left-handed example of at least one of your designs. Refusing to consider 10% of your potential customer base and even going so far as to insult them is a poor business move. I guarantee you wouldn't be happy if all you could buy was a left-handed Woodsrunner to shoot.
Perhaps but he found they were much harder to sell.I am going to nit pick here ! LH firearms have a higher resale because they are very hard to find !
Rumors. Build it and we will come. If they have not been built, how can you determine they will not sell? Build 10% of the number of righties as lefties and charge 20% more. That is the way it is now days.Perhaps but he found they were much harder to sell.
Enter your email address to join: