• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Lock speed kibler SMR vs Woodsrunner

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Texcl2

32 Cal
Joined
Oct 31, 2024
Messages
37
Reaction score
40
Location
ND
For you guys who own both, is the SMR ignition speed a lot faster than the woodsrunner? I’m getting ready to order one or the other primarily as an offhand shooter, my VA rifle is great but lock speed is not great and it is pretty heavy overall. I’m really on the fence and will buy both eventually, but for now I need a tie breaker.
 
Don't know if it makes any difference and I'm sure you noticed but the SMR also has set triggers. There is also another current thread where some of us put up pics of the balance points in different calibers if that's of any interest.
 
the videos I’ve seen seem to represent the smr as a lot faster but it’s hard to really tell with videos.
 
Kibler's SMR runs circles around the Woodsrunner for match shooting. The big round-faced lock is fast, very fast, but it's big and there's no comparison to the little lock. Have both and shot both in competition. Won quite a few matches this year with the SMR .45 and am currently building another with a faster twist barrel, more drop in the stock, a Kibler Ketland lock and Kibler set triggers.
 
I have both, and I swear the SMR is faster. I rarely feel any delay when I pull the set trigger on the SMR. I also think the woodsrunner is faster than my Siler locks. Again that is personal perception.
Both the SMR and woodsrunner are easy on flints. I think that is a sign of a fast shaving lock.
I shoot all offhand, and the SMR holds a lot easier for me. It is very light, yet the long barrel is very steady.
I have the woodsrunner in 54, and SMR in 45. I shoot 50G in both, but the lighter 45 ball naturally has less recoil, and still makes a hole in the paper. Anyway, for me the SMR is easier to shoot paper.
 
Cool, sounds like the SMR is the way to go. I have a Fowler on order from them already, I’m going to go quick ship this time with the SMR and hopefully get it built in time for my Christmas vacation. Thanks for all the info guys!
 
Cool, sounds like the SMR is the way to go. I have a Fowler on order from them already, I’m going to go quick ship this time with the SMR and hopefully get it built in time for my Christmas vacation. Thanks for all the info guys!
Got mine in quick ship, ordered 9/25 in my hands 9/30. You should have plenty of time! Enjoy, they're truly wonderful rifles.
1000010992.jpg
 
So what causes the larger locks to be slower? Just takes longer for the **** to hit the frizzen and spark as in more distance? I assumed the SMR lock was just more evolved (later gen) with rollers ect and that might increase speed.
 
I'm not a flintlock expert by any means. But the longer the travel between flint and frizzen. Should make the minor difference in lock speed . Also the fact that all lock making and assembly is done in house at Kiblers shop I do believe but I could be wrong on that.
 
Back
Top