Manufacture Date for my Uberti Revolver

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Welcome to the forum

Regards,

Jimfrom the Left Coast of WA State!

I like the Uberti 1861 better than the Pietta 1861 because as both are 4-screw frames CFS (cut-for-stock) but the Pietta does not have the bottom backstrap cutout for the shoulder stock. Go figure, and I am a big Pietta 1851 Navy "type" revolver fan.

CZ is 2020. Here is the current Italian date code list.



We all like photos of revolvers so show us yours!
 
What if my uberti does not have one of those stamps on it?
I have a cimarron model 66 and it was made by uberti, researching it today I learned that cimmeron started in the early 80s so it's not as old as I thought, I used to think it might have been made in the 1960s because it has a serial number below 3,000, but I also see people saying that back then only Henry's and model 73s were made.

These are about the only marks I can find on it
IMG_20231208_141222_HDR~2.jpg
 
Welcome to the forum

Regards,

Jimfrom the Left Coast of WA State!

I like the Uberti 1861 better than the Pietta 1861 because as both are 4-screw frames CFS (cut-for-stock) but the Pietta does not have the bottom backstrap cutout for the shoulder stock. Go figure, and I am a big Pietta 1851 Navy "type" revolver fan.

CZ is 2020. Here is the current Italian date code list.



We all like photos of revolvers so show us yours!
Thank you for posting this, as it came in very handy to figure out that my Uberti Cattleman revolver was made in 1974.
 
I'd like to know when my Uberti 51Navy was made. Serial #1573. Navy Arms CO. stamped on the left side frame.

Above the wedge on the right side of the barrel is Made in Italy, and just below that - AU in script.

Top of the barrel near the cylinder - --- Navy Arms Co. ---

Those are the only markings on the gun - no proof marks, nothing. It doesn't appear to have been defarbed, so I'll bet this is how it was new. In fact, it probably hadn't been touched by a technician, because the loading lever was extremely stiff barely moving requiring fitting (not due to old grease) and the main spring was so stiff it was a two-thumb hammer.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top