DOUBLEDEUCE 1
69 Cal.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
- Messages
- 4,165
- Reaction score
- 877
On the 1860 Army, is the barrel two pieces ? It almost looks like a seam or joint at the base of the round portion of the barrel before the flair for the ratchet.
On the 1860 Army, is the barrel two pieces ? It almost looks like a seam or joint at the base of the round portion of the barrel before the flair for the ratchet.
It looks like the front sight on the pistol is on backwards.
It’s not two pieces. It’s a kit which wasn’t finished. I do see the same line on some ASM’s, Pietta’s too from time to time.On the 1860 Army, is the barrel two pieces ? It almost looks like a seam or joint at the base of the round portion of the barrel before the flair for the ratchet.
I think he was referring to the Richland Arms kentuckyThat is typical of the 1860 type.
Oooop! Sorry!I think he was referring to the Richland Arms kentucky
Those UM cylinders are for low-power cowboy loads only; they're plenty strong, it's the gun itself that is the "weakest link"; if using modern hi-power ammunition, all bets are off."I blew up my Remington 44 convertible revolver"
I'll bet he was using one of those cylinders that we aren't supposed to discuss here.
Another example of why we must use Eye Protection!Your wish is my command. I thought I had posted pictures right after it happened.
View attachment 198255
Those UM cylinders are for low-power cowboy loads only; they're plenty strong, it's the gun itself that is the "weakest link"; if using modern hi-power ammunition, all bets are off.
Enter your email address to join: