Temper range on the 1095 chart does concur with what you said, however that is based on a water quench reaching 66 Rc, which is it's max hardness. When oil quenching, chances are 1095 is not going to quite reach 66 rc. Even if it did, 1095 does a better job as a cutting tool at around 58 to 62 Rc. I would shoot for maybe 58/60 Rc, to make sharpening easier. To each his own on PC, but I can't see trying to duplicate the hardness of original early steels. We are using modern steel to make PC looking knives in this hobby, which is a far cry from blister, or shear steel. Why waste the inherant potential of the steel, in order to be more PC, by making an inferior blade on purpose? One would end up having to sharpen more often, and the blade wears away faster. Most all of us accept modern steel gun barrels which last much longer, and are stronger than the originals. What's the dif?