Mike Brooks
Cannon
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2005
- Messages
- 6,686
- Reaction score
- 33
Nobdy realy knows for sure what to make of the O'Conner gun. The current conclusion is it is a post F&I war trade gun made by the British for a short time to appease the former French allied Indians that were used to Frenck type D styled Fusils.
The Type G was built probably as early as the 1720's or earlier, thru at least the Rev war. The North West gun was built about the same time frame, but was traded thru great lakes and points north and west . The type G was traded in all points south and south west of there. The NW gun had the Iron trigger guard and a simple sheet brass but plate with a plain finial, and the G had a brass trigger guard and a sheet brass buttplate with more elaborate finial. Both the NW gun and the type G were similar to english built fowling pieces than the french styling the O'conner gun has.
The O'conor gun, is quite a bit different than the Type G and NW gun, The O'Connor guns buttplate and french archetecture can't be compared to the English archetecture of the G and NW gun.
The Type G was built probably as early as the 1720's or earlier, thru at least the Rev war. The North West gun was built about the same time frame, but was traded thru great lakes and points north and west . The type G was traded in all points south and south west of there. The NW gun had the Iron trigger guard and a simple sheet brass but plate with a plain finial, and the G had a brass trigger guard and a sheet brass buttplate with more elaborate finial. Both the NW gun and the type G were similar to english built fowling pieces than the french styling the O'conner gun has.
The O'conor gun, is quite a bit different than the Type G and NW gun, The O'Connor guns buttplate and french archetecture can't be compared to the English archetecture of the G and NW gun.