Grandpa Ron
45 Cal.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2011
- Messages
- 571
- Reaction score
- 10
I have heard this argument ad nauseum for years. It is nothing more than an attempt to reinforce the fact that folks are so pent up on the common; that they ignore or deny the co-existing technology and those pesky anomalies show up at virtually every archeological dig.
Those “one of” that someone needed and “hand crafted” are indeed part of the historic record. To deny that these unique exceptions existed is simply a falsehood to the public.
Likewise when the historic record states something like “The men march out with their brightly colored shirts” and only two different color shirts have been found; that is not proof that there were no other colors. The lack of documentation is not proof of non-existence.
All this is interesting opinion and rhetoric but open to: Pages 25 and 26 of Ryan Gale’s book “For Trade and Treaty” and you will find a picture of a late 17th to early 18th century dog locked fowler that is painted black. The author indicates it is typical of those sold by the Hudson’s Bay Company.
It is true it is not a Type “G” (another modern term) but it is a fowler and it is painted black.
We also know that one of the so call type “G” guns was made by John Bumford who also produced guns for the HBC.
Those “one of” that someone needed and “hand crafted” are indeed part of the historic record. To deny that these unique exceptions existed is simply a falsehood to the public.
Likewise when the historic record states something like “The men march out with their brightly colored shirts” and only two different color shirts have been found; that is not proof that there were no other colors. The lack of documentation is not proof of non-existence.
All this is interesting opinion and rhetoric but open to: Pages 25 and 26 of Ryan Gale’s book “For Trade and Treaty” and you will find a picture of a late 17th to early 18th century dog locked fowler that is painted black. The author indicates it is typical of those sold by the Hudson’s Bay Company.
It is true it is not a Type “G” (another modern term) but it is a fowler and it is painted black.
We also know that one of the so call type “G” guns was made by John Bumford who also produced guns for the HBC.