Frank Savage
32 Cal.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2009
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 0
Maybe this was discussed in past, but even google didnt find it for me.
The obvious (and as it seems, frequently used) way to fit parallel octagon is to let it sitting on the bottom flat.
But-I´ve red about barrels sitting on both sloped bottoom-side flats with a small clearance between the barrel and wood on bottom flat, which keeps better support for both down- and side forces.
I was surprised how obvious and easy this method was for me, when I started with removing the square excess after finishing the bottom-flat wide chanel.
Any experiences with pros or cons of the second set-up?
I have now some 85% or better fit on both flats, so I regret loosing this for less than half of current holding surface.
Thank You
The obvious (and as it seems, frequently used) way to fit parallel octagon is to let it sitting on the bottom flat.
But-I´ve red about barrels sitting on both sloped bottoom-side flats with a small clearance between the barrel and wood on bottom flat, which keeps better support for both down- and side forces.
I was surprised how obvious and easy this method was for me, when I started with removing the square excess after finishing the bottom-flat wide chanel.
Any experiences with pros or cons of the second set-up?
I have now some 85% or better fit on both flats, so I regret loosing this for less than half of current holding surface.
Thank You