Opinions on Pietta 1851 Confederate Navy revolver?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I think Pietta has stepped up their game as of late. You will be happy with it. As far as brass framed guns go, ya can't really argue it over a steel frame. But if its brass you want, stick to 36 Cal and 15 - 18 grains of powder and I think it will last a while. I only have one brass frame, only because that's what a Griswold and Gunnison clone should be made of. And I will say this, that little .375 ball is moving pretty good in front of 18 grains.
 
I have an ASM brasser in 44 pretty much like his Piettas. I got no complaints as far a light loads and it being a fantasy piece. So? It serves it's purpose quite well. Now if I had to do it all over again I'd go steel framed 36 cal. But at this stage in life ,it'll do.
 
Thinking about getting into a BP revolver and leaning towards the Pietta 1851 Confederate Navy .44 cal.. First a few questions, will cci #11 caps work on this pistol ? I have a good supply of #11 caps but have never even seen #10 caps . Next, some have said the brass frame pistols don't last or hold up and will only handle "light loads". Any truth to this ? Overall, is it a quality pistol as far as durability , accuracy, and maintenance ? Any thoughts or opinions ?
-Thanks

pietta-1851-confederate-navy-revolver-44-cal-REB44_798x267.jpg

Buy steel frame only.
Will last longer.
Resale value is higher.
 
No to the brass frame, the cylinder acts like a slide hammer and beats the recoil shield, this eventually increases end shake to the point of the gun not firing. Go with the steel, if it's a Uberti fix the short arbor and tune it, it will last a lifetime.
 
No to the brass frame, the cylinder acts like a slide hammer and beats the recoil shield, this eventually increases end shake to the point of the gun not firing. Go with the steel, if it's a Uberti fix the short arbor and tune it, it will last a lifetime.
Steel is better, but if OP is an occasional sporting shooter, and he doesn't always load maximum powder loads, I don't think he should hesitate to buy a brass frame revolver if one piques his interest, and it becomes available at a reasonable price. He's not likely to shoot it enough to encounter the problems ascribed to brass frames detailed here.
 
Thinking about getting into a BP revolver and leaning towards the Pietta 1851 Confederate Navy .44 cal.. First a few questions, will cci #11 caps work on this pistol ? I have a good supply of #11 caps but have never even seen #10 caps . Next, some have said the brass frame pistols don't last or hold up and will only handle "light loads". Any truth to this ? Overall, is it a quality pistol as far as durability , accuracy, and maintenance ? Any thoughts or opinions ?
-Thanks

pietta-1851-confederate-navy-revolver-44-cal-REB44_798x267.jpg


I bought mine 30 years ago, along with several extra cylinders. It was for an article in a now defunct magazine about the "lowest budget" needed getting into CAS shooting, and at the time, the brass, .44 "Navy" revolvers were the least expensive option.

I was quite surprised at how accurate they were at 50 feet from a rest. I also noticed that five out of the six chambers in each of the cylinders, the cylidner sold with the revolver from the factory or the extras, were very accurate, but in every one the sixth chamber always threw a the ball slightly out of the grouping. SO I marked that chamber, and removed the nipple. In CAS you only loaded five chambers anyway, so why not use the slightly less accurate one as the empty one? Removing the nipple made remembering which chamber was the undesired one, easy.

I shot 20 grains of 3Fg with a dry felt wad, a .451 ball, and Dynamit Noble RWS pistol caps. Sometimes I'd shoot 15 grains and double up the felt wads. You're only trying to ring the steel, afterall. Never had a problem, BUT you will need pistol caps, as rifle caps are too big.

I bought another of the same model as they were so inexpensive at the time, and removed the loading lever and cut down the barrel for a "vest pocket pistol" for the CAS side matches that were held from time to time. It still shot very well although I didn't put on a front sight, and only point-shot with it.

LD
 

Latest posts

Back
Top