• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Opinions Requested on Next Kibler SMR Caliber

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I ordered mine in 40 caliber. The .36 i was using just wasn’t consistent enough at 75 for target shooting. Even the 40 requires a well placed shot to drop steel.
 
For those of you who have a Kibler SMR in .32 would it be possible to show us the balance point on the rifle?

Yes, I know it will be slightly different due to wood and wood density but close enough for me to make a decision.
Here is the balance point on my .32 in maple.
IMG_20241124_073544552_HDR.jpg

IMG_20241124_073556347_HDR.jpg
 
My .36 is just a bit behind the pictured .32's. Net is...with that long skinny barrel, the caliber choices don't make a lot of difference in weight or balance point. Offhand in the field, I know I'm not good enough to have a few oz of weight or half inch balance point difference matter.
 
Gentlemen, I am amazed.... Here is my Kibler SMR in .45 with a standard grade maple stock as you can see the balance point is not that different than your .32's

I would have guessed mine would be further back toward the action and I would have been wrong.

Thanks all!
Oh wait!
You guys are just trying to get me to buy another Kibler aren't you!

Kibler SMR balance point.jpg
 
How bout that. I would have thought the 40 and 45 would be feather weights with all the weight to the rear as well. This particular model of rifle handles well enough even my short, weak, office worker wife thinks it's handy.
 
Back
Top