Original musket flints

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Aug 4, 2004
Messages
8,778
Reaction score
3,899
Location
The Land of Enchantment
Just ordered a pound of mixed English and French musket flints from IMA. Will report on what I receive. They estimate 30 to 40 flints per pound for about $30, and this will give me a chance to compare the performance of grey English flints and French amber flints.
 
I swear I saw a discussion of these very same flints on here just a few weeks ago but I can't find it now. It may have been a part of a thread drift. :idunno: I do remember part of the discussion was about the percentage of flints that were actually usable out of the total.
 
This reminds me of experience and discussion on a couple of early Russian American archaeology digs I was part of. In and around the trading post we'd find lots of flints. The archeo's were calling them "lost" flints. But from looking them over and comparing with what I knew to be good, serviceable flints, I knew they weren't lost at all. They were pure junk and someone back in the day had tossed them! :grin:
 
BrownBear said:
This reminds me of experience and discussion on a couple of early Russian American archaeology digs I was part of. In and around the trading post we'd find lots of flints. The archeo's were calling them "lost" flints. But from looking them over and comparing with what I knew to be good, serviceable flints, I knew they weren't lost at all. They were pure junk and someone back in the day had tossed them! :grin:


Were the Russians using gun spalls (flints napped in the older English style which are pretty crude looking) or gun flints (napped in the French style and pretty much the universal 'flints' we see today such as Tom Fuller flints) ?
 
Saw some of each. Older were spawls, newer were napped. I'm guessing it had a lot to do with the French and experience leading up to the Crimean War.
 
How do you know they are old. Outside of the site rocks are hard to date. Depending on the soil there may be some mineralsation or fungal growth, but I have found lots of arrowheads that looked brand new. :idunno:
 
Back
Top