For years I've used oxyoke wonderwads with every rifled muzzleloader hunting load I've used...both PRBs & conicals...and they've always provided worthwhile improvements in protecting the patch, tightning groups, etc...note I said 'rifled' muzzleloaders.
Yet in both .54 and .62 caliber smoothbores where I've been experimenting for the best PRB load, using a "wonderwad" under a patched ball made the groups worse than when just using a patched ball.
In the .54cal, using a wad didn't affect general group size, but would sporadically cause a wild flyer 6" away from an otherwise very tight group at 50yds...all the way to the edge of a large paper plate...if I eliminated the wad the flyers stopped...put it back in and the flyers started again.
In the .62cal, the "wonderwad" didn't cause an occasional random flyer, but would open up the group to a several inches in general....remove the wad and the groups closed up with holes often touching.
In trying to figure out the "failure mechanism" so to speak, I've wondered if:
The edge of a wad is occasionally getting "blown out" just at muzzle exit and puts an influence on the exiting ball...but I tried 1, 2, and 3 wonderwads thinking that if stacked up, there would be enough material to prevent the wad nearest the ball from blowing out...but that made no difference...still got the occasional flyer.
So now I'm wondering if the thin soft "wonderwad" is occasionally developing a "spin" rotation as it accelerates up the smoothbore which somehow influences the ball at exit...ie: it may spin one way one time, another way another time, or not at all some times, etc, giving non-uniform group results.
Not total speculation because this phenomenon exists in the modern trap & skeet shotgunning world such that trap and skeet barrels can be bought which have 4 straight grooves running the length of the bore to lock the wads in place so no shotcup rotation can occur and negatively influence the pattern.
Curious what the brain trust might think about this "apparent" trend...good results with wonderwads in rifles...opposite results with wonderwads in smoothbores ??
Yet in both .54 and .62 caliber smoothbores where I've been experimenting for the best PRB load, using a "wonderwad" under a patched ball made the groups worse than when just using a patched ball.
In the .54cal, using a wad didn't affect general group size, but would sporadically cause a wild flyer 6" away from an otherwise very tight group at 50yds...all the way to the edge of a large paper plate...if I eliminated the wad the flyers stopped...put it back in and the flyers started again.
In the .62cal, the "wonderwad" didn't cause an occasional random flyer, but would open up the group to a several inches in general....remove the wad and the groups closed up with holes often touching.
In trying to figure out the "failure mechanism" so to speak, I've wondered if:
The edge of a wad is occasionally getting "blown out" just at muzzle exit and puts an influence on the exiting ball...but I tried 1, 2, and 3 wonderwads thinking that if stacked up, there would be enough material to prevent the wad nearest the ball from blowing out...but that made no difference...still got the occasional flyer.
So now I'm wondering if the thin soft "wonderwad" is occasionally developing a "spin" rotation as it accelerates up the smoothbore which somehow influences the ball at exit...ie: it may spin one way one time, another way another time, or not at all some times, etc, giving non-uniform group results.
Not total speculation because this phenomenon exists in the modern trap & skeet shotgunning world such that trap and skeet barrels can be bought which have 4 straight grooves running the length of the bore to lock the wads in place so no shotcup rotation can occur and negatively influence the pattern.
Curious what the brain trust might think about this "apparent" trend...good results with wonderwads in rifles...opposite results with wonderwads in smoothbores ??