Black Hand
Cannon
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2005
- Messages
- 9,348
- Reaction score
- 897
I've read accounts where hides were scraped to make "soup" in winter and rawhide moccasin soles were roasted and eaten. Compared to these, pemmican would be a luxury...
Funny you should say that....I have read far more accounts of cannibalism, than I have of people eating pemmican....flehto said:Starving explorers, voyageurs and other restless people out in the wilderness who are on the verge of cannibalism might consider the lesser of 2 evils and opt for pemmican or they might not.....Fred
satx78247 said:TRUE. - I won't tell the "sensitive types" here how KIM-CHI was traditionally made & what it smells like.
yours, satx
Just remember that your caloric need doubles or triples when in the field, so 3000 calories would be a good start. Then again, I'm a skinny guy with a not-so-skinny appetite which only increases in the field...tenngun said:An underline on your post should be GOOD pemmican. I've had some pretty fatty stuff. Normally we eat from 150 -300 calories of bacon. Not 3000 calories.
Im a fat boy that has to fight my weight all the time.Black Hand said:Just remember that your caloric need doubles or triples when in the field, so 3000 calories would be a good start. Then again, I'm a skinny guy with a not-so-skinny appetite which only increases in the field...tenngun said:An underline on your post should be GOOD pemmican. I've had some pretty fatty stuff. Normally we eat from 150 -300 calories of bacon. Not 3000 calories.
Never go on a scout without bacon.
Old photos bear this out.crockett said:He writes several times of jerky being made by "splitting" the meat into strips or cutting lengthwise, etc. I realize that today a lot of folks cut slices across the grain with the idea it dries faster and is easier to eat but the original method seems to be cutting along the grain.
I agree that cutting across the grain seems to be a modern (easier to chew) method. We tend to cut it into small pieces too. Perhaps because many today see it as a “snack”, not a “food source”?
I agree, but it may also be easier to deal with larger pieces to begin with and cut off small pieces later (after drying) as needed, rather than spending a lot of time cutting small pieces initially, when it may not be necessary?Loyalist Dave said:I agree that cutting across the grain seems to be a modern (easier to chew) method. We tend to cut it into small pieces too. Perhaps because many today see it as a “snack”, not a “food source”?
Claude,
I wonder if it's the tools available for preparation as well? We have very sharp knives, nice flat, level counters, and cutting boards. If you simply started carving muscle tissue straight out of the game animal right after opening the hide, would you not follow the bones to which the muscles were attached and so be going along with the grain instead of cross-grain? Literally going from the animal on the ground to the rack over the heat source as quickly as you could?
LD
Enter your email address to join: