dlhumphrey
32 Cal.
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2010
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 0
I want to thank you all for your valuable input. I knew that I would get some good advice after looking through some of the other posts.
After all your input and looking at the photos of the different guns I have considered (1851, 1858, and 1860) it looks to me that the 1858 Army has a hammer that may be more user friendly for me. It looks to be shorter and cocked back a little more than the 1851 and 1860. I saw a You Tube review where the person did comment that the hammer stuck up rather straight on his 1851 and if was a little difficult for him to cock. I have rather small hands and that may be a plus.
I intend to look for a steel framed revolver. There is a local dealer that carries both Pietta and Uberti and I can actually handle the weapons and pick one that feels right. His prices are quite a bit higher than Cabela’s but I would probably get better service if needed.
Thanks again for all the good advice and comments.
After all your input and looking at the photos of the different guns I have considered (1851, 1858, and 1860) it looks to me that the 1858 Army has a hammer that may be more user friendly for me. It looks to be shorter and cocked back a little more than the 1851 and 1860. I saw a You Tube review where the person did comment that the hammer stuck up rather straight on his 1851 and if was a little difficult for him to cock. I have rather small hands and that may be a plus.
I intend to look for a steel framed revolver. There is a local dealer that carries both Pietta and Uberti and I can actually handle the weapons and pick one that feels right. His prices are quite a bit higher than Cabela’s but I would probably get better service if needed.
Thanks again for all the good advice and comments.