You don’t get ‘knock down power’ from a muzzle loader. Ball or conical you have low velocity and energy.Thanks for the input folks. I think I might try the sabots and if they don't shoot well, may go with a conical instead. If all else fails, there is always the round ball.
Conical keep velocity better than ball, ball delivers energy better to the target. But both are low yield guns.
Both depend on shot placement.
I only shoot ball, and except for griz and Alaskan brown bear ball is effective on everything in North America.
You want you best accuracy in your shot.
70 grains under a ball will shoot through deer and elk and if you have a good hit will kill them DRT or in a very short post shot run.
Number one rule, get close. Think of an ml as archery on steroids.
Plenty of guys have had clean two hundred yard kills. However these boys had good field of fire, know their guns and know their loads. In general aim for a hundred or less. And fifty or less is even better
Lewis and Clark had powder in lead jars. The jars weighed eight pounds and carried four pounds of lead.
So shot loads were 50% weight. If they had the .50 cal 1797 rifles that’s a 90 grain charge. If they had the .54 HF 1803 that’s 110 grains. But that was GI powder. Mere coal dust it’s been called. Most likely 1-1.5 f in todays world. And except for grizz they did real well, but same thing, they got close before taking a shot.