Leave Star Trek out of this.... :rotf:
(Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!)
Ahem....anyway, I am surprised at the number of not only wheelgun fans here, but also the number of you that own two or more of them!
I have a feeling they hold the same type of attraction that captures the rocklock owners on the forum.
For those of you who replied, please spill yer guts and tell which one is your fave, and more importantly, WHY.
In this regard, I gave a brief explanation, but let me expand that answer:
If I had to choose one gun out of my four, it would be, hands-down, the Remmy. Not simply because it's SS and a snap to clean up, and the SS parts don't rust (although that IS a great bonus! :grin: ) but primarily because;
*It fits my hand and grip
*It points reasonably well
*It shoots and groups reasonably accurately
*I could reload a spare, fully loaded cylinder in seconds, not minutes. To carry two extra loaded & capped cylinders on your belt in battle would make you a formidable enemy, indeed. (Yes, I realize the foolhardiness of this in present-day, but in the heat of battle with lead whistling around your ears, I wouldn't care!)
*As to the above, this would be FAR easier to wrangle on horseback...or in battle!
*The Enclosed frame design appears much stronger, like an O-frame reloading press, less likely to "spring" if dropped or abused
*Speaking of presses, the loading lever is of a better design (IMHO) than the Colt lever, and is streamlined better for less opportunity to catch on gunleather
*The notches between the nipples are deep, positive and secure. I don't trust the pins on any of my Colts
*No barrel wedge to futz with, no clearance issues with cylinder-to-forcing cone to deal with, especially in the heat of battle
*Grips come off from the sides, grip frame an integral part of gun frame
*Cylinder pin arrangement is slick; pin slides forward with ease but can't get lost
*Front sight is better than the brass pin on the Navy, and doesn't loosen like the brass wedge sight on my Army
*Rear sight notch is fixed to the frame, and not attached to a moving part subject to wear as on the Colts
*Hammer striker is thinner, imparts (IMHO) a sharper, more centralized blow to the caps
*(Somewhat) adjustable mainspring tension
*The .44 is so much more of a "man-stopper" than a .36 ball would be. Not important to me, but if I were a cavalry officer, it would be!
*Lighter in weight than some of the older designs such as Walkers, Dragoons, etc
Whew...there! Enough reasons? I hope so, because I'm about out of 'em!
Now, I'm sure there are a few of you out there that would disagree with my conclusions, so fire away. Tell me what YOU prefer, and why!