burch said:
I`ll keep that in mind. Maybe I do just need to back off the powder some.
AND...if you can get your hands on some #5 shot that's always a good experiment too.
At first you think larger heavier pellets take up more room so there will be less pellets in the same space, making an even thinner pattern, etc.
BUT...the extra weight of larger heavier pellets can fly a little further forward in a straight line before starting to veer off opening the pattern so it can surprise you.
Bottom line, for small game size targets like the body of a squirrel inside all that fur, a cylinder bore probably won't consistently get it done with the current pattern on that 25yd target.
So yes, it wouldn't hurt to drop back 10grns of powder and see if it tightens up a few more pellets.
Then the next part of trying to balance the 3 sides of a triangle is energy / penetration.
You could fill in that pattern with more pellets of a smaller lighter size like 7.5s or 8s...but of course then they'd be too light at 25yds with a light powder charge to penetrate through a steel tuna or soup can. (a pretty good test vehicle)
Good fun constantly juggling powder charge, number and size of wads, size of shot pellets, size of shot charge, penetration, usable distance, etc.
And it won't be the same load for all game...a more open pattern of large pellets like your 25yd target will be fine for a crow coming in to decoys...but something much tighter for the tiny skull & neck vertebrae of a turkey at 25yds would be needed.
Something in between works for squirrels & rabbits.
:thumbsup: