I sometimes wonder if the species of trees really make a difference in the taste of smoked products.....or is it all in our minds?
It would seem that the species of trees that are used for smoking meats and fish would be abundant in specific areas. Hickory. maples, mesquite and all fruit wood all come to mind as being regional wood for smoking. Why couldn't elm, ash, birch and oak be used for smoking? Has anyone tried these woods?
Perhaps smoke is just smoke irrespective of the wood used? Excepting of course the trees other than the deciduous varieties, eg...pine, fir, etc. I truly don't know the answer and don't own a smoker, but am well supplied w/ smoked products from my son.
Perhaps my son could try the wood that's not used for smoking and we could have a taste test. Possibly the outcome would be surprising?.....Fred