Here's another colonial ball bag, ca. 1770. It's not the prettiest style of ball bags, but I'm going through and reproducing as many ball/shot bags as I can. Including this ugly duckling.
Making this bag presented me with a conundrum. The bag is all leather, except for the stopper. That means the leather throat provides all the support to keep the stopper in place. So the leather has to be thick and hardened. But the bag is constructed with hidden seams, which means you sew the bag wrong-side out, and then you turn the bag inside out when you're done. So the leather has to be thin enough to turn it inside out. Given the narrow width of the bag, I settled on 2-3 oz. veg tan.
The bag is one piece, folded over, and sewn along the bottom and one side.
The tapered stopper is completely hidden down inside the throat. The stopper has a leather thong attached to pull the stopper out of the bag.
All in all, this is a really poor design for a ball bag, for a few reasons:
1. You have to use a thin leather, which means you can't really harden the leather. The throat offers little support for the stopper, and the bag is flimsy.
2. From a craftsman's perspective, it's complicated to make and not aesthetically pleasing. It has the nice hidden seam around the bottom and side, but then it has an exposed seam along the stopper.
3. It's a lot of work just to make an ugly ball bag.
Given the dimensions stated in the reference book, and the photos, I can calculate the size of the spout, plug, etc., by doing a proportional analysis.
Bench work to shape the Maple stopper. I prefer rasps if I can, instead of chisels or carving knives.
Stitching the bag on my home-made stitching horse.
The hidden seam
The stopper is completely hidden inside of the bag.