Restoring a 1864 Springfield

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

bruce3163

32 Cal
Joined
Jan 17, 2025
Messages
9
Reaction score
6
Location
Parma mi
I am starting restoration on an 1864 Springfield. And have some questions for the group.
I don't have a complete rifle for reference so I need some measurements for installing the new forearm.
Could someone give me the distance from the back of the rear band to the back of the middle band.
Also for reference the distance from the front of end cap to the end of barrel.
I could also use a photo and reference to where the ramrod retainer spring is mounted.
IMG_20250117_152606911.jpg
 
What you have is a US Model 1861 rifle musket dated 1864. The best source for a replacement stock or forearm is Dunlap Woodcrafts in Chantilly, Virginia. Check their Military Stocks section at:
https://dunlapwoodcrafts.com/military-stocks
They are a first quality supplier and reasonably priced. For questions, call them and discuss what you need.

Of course you will also need a middle band and front band, two band springs and nose cap available from other sources.
 
What you have is a US Model 1861 rifle musket dated 1864. The best source for a replacement stock or forearm is Dunlap Woodcrafts in Chantilly, Virginia. Check their Military Stocks section at:
https://dunlapwoodcrafts.com/military-stocks
They are a first quality supplier and reasonably priced. For questions, call them and discuss what you need.

Of course you will also need a middle band and front band, two band springs and nose cap available from other sources.
I have all needed parts as I stated.
I have requested some measurements from the group to properly install the new parts.
Please read my post.
 
Your gun really looks like an old Bannerman's sporterized musket. Bannerman bought tons of surplus weapons.
a lot of the civil war muskets Bannerman cut down and made cheap shot guns out of them.
Is your barrel full length still? 40".
 
Your gun really looks like an old Bannerman's sporterized musket. Bannerman bought tons of surplus weapons.
a lot of the civil war muskets Bannerman cut down and made cheap shot guns out of them.
Is your barrel full length still? 40".
Yes still full length
 
IMG_3266.jpeg
I am starting restoration on an 1864 Springfield. And have some questions for the group.
I don't have a complete rifle for reference so I need some measurements for installing the new forearm.
Could someone give me the distance from the back of the rear band to the back of the middle band.
Also for reference the distance from the front of end cap to the end of barrel.
I could also use a photo and reference to where the ramrod retainer spring is mounted.
View attachment 376596

Hello sir, I’m happy to help. My rifle is an 1861 type 2 with a lock dated 1864. She’s all original except for the rear sight.

Barrel band…….. 11-5/8”
Nose to barrel….. 2-7/8”

My rifle has a wooden bump-out (“bulge”)….reinforced by the back of the nosecap (see pics). The bulge pushes down on the ramrod to wedge it in. If there is a ramrod spring inside the stock I haven’t seen it.

IMG_3264.jpeg
IMG_3263.jpeg
IMG_3265.jpeg

IMG_3267.jpegIMG_3266.jpeg
IMG_0255.jpeg
 
Last edited:
There is no ramrod retention spring in a 61. The rammer is retained by the swell near the tulip fitting into a slightly enlarged portion of the ramrod channel which is clearly visible in the photos of the nose cap above. The correct way to measure the bands is from the breech end of the barrel, the intersection of the tang and barrel. These dimension are from that intersection to the back (breech) side of the bands.
Front: 33.10"
Middle 21.50"
Rear: 9.87"
I don't see any sights in your photo but reproduction front & rear are available. It's likely the dovetail and screw hole for the rear sight have been filled and sometimes it's hard to find them if it was a good job. The sight locations are measured from the back of the barrel (as above) to the back side of the front sight and to the back side of the rear sight base.
Rear sight: 2.75"
Sight radius: 30.56"
The overall stock length which I assume is measured parallel with the bore and without metal fitted is 55"
 
There is no ramrod retention spring in a 61. The rammer is retained by the swell near the tulip fitting into a slightly enlarged portion of the ramrod channel which is clearly visible in the photos of the nose cap above. The correct way to measure the bands is from the breech end of the barrel, the intersection of the tang and barrel. These dimension are from that intersection to the back (breech) side of the bands.
Front: 33.10"
Middle 21.50"
Rear: 9.87"
I don't see any sights in your photo but reproduction front & rear are available. It's likely the dovetail and screw hole for the rear sight have been filled and sometimes it's hard to find them if it was a good job. The sight locations are measured from the back of the barrel (as above) to the back side of the front sight and to the back side of the rear sight base.
Rear sight: 2.75"
Sight radius: 30.56"
The overall stock length which I assume is measured parallel with the bore and without metal fitted is 55"
I have the front sight. The rear has a dovetail. I was wondering if the rear sight was attached with insert with a threaded hole.
The repo sight I purchased has part of the bottom flat and part rounded.
Is that normal.
Thank you for the dimensions. And info.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250118_161043669_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20250118_161043669_HDR.jpg
    1.4 MB
  • IMG_20250118_161102753_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20250118_161102753_HDR.jpg
    1.3 MB
  • IMG_20250118_161119999.jpg
    IMG_20250118_161119999.jpg
    1.1 MB
  • IMG_20250118_161135975.jpg
    IMG_20250118_161135975.jpg
    1.6 MB
  • IMG_20250118_161119999.jpg
    IMG_20250118_161119999.jpg
    1.1 MB
  • IMG_20250118_161135975.jpg
    IMG_20250118_161135975.jpg
    1.6 MB
Quite normal and you'll notice the dovetail in the barrel had one vertical side and one dovetailed with a matching dovetail in the barrel. There is a special screw (10-32) to hold the sight in place, looks like you have it.
 
Quite normal and you'll notice the dovetail in the barrel had one vertical side and one dovetailed with a matching dovetail in the barrel. There is a special screw (10-32) to hold the sight in place, looks like you have it.
I see what your talking about. The dovetail on the repo sight is to wide will have to narrow it up.
Can't see where the screw hole was will have to redrill and tap. Should be fun.
 
Unless that's not the original dovetail in the barrel in the original location the repro sight should be a perfect fit. The beveled end goes in first (to the rear) and then tip it down. Mark the barrel through the screw hole and you should be able to find where the original hole was filled. 2.75" from the back of the barrel to the rear of the sight base.
 
Quite normal and you'll notice the dovetail in the barrel had one vertical side and one dovetailed with a matching dovetail in the barrel. There is a special screw (10-32) to hold the sight in place, looks like you have it.
Got the new sight mounted today. Had to file about .050 out of dovetail to fit it. Drilled out screw hole mine was 8-32. Could not see any sign of original hole. Had to grind end of tap to get enough thread. Don't know how they did it 150 years ago. Barrel is very thin in that area.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250119_144141712.jpg
    IMG_20250119_144141712.jpg
    2.1 MB
Making some progress on my project.
Fitted the replacement forearm.
End cap and barrel bands.
Hope I can blend the new wood to the old color.
Lot of filing and sanding so far with more to go.
Still have to I let the band retainers.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250129_170339156.jpg
    IMG_20250129_170339156.jpg
    2 MB
  • IMG_20250129_170328301.jpg
    IMG_20250129_170328301.jpg
    2 MB
  • IMG_20250129_170322171.jpg
    IMG_20250129_170322171.jpg
    2.3 MB
  • IMG_20250129_170310196.jpg
    IMG_20250129_170310196.jpg
    1.8 MB
Great project there Pard! I am by no means an expert but it looks like your two replacement barrel bands are the “oval” type used on later models, 1863 and beyond. I think you want the “flat” type to match your one remaining original. Only the middle barrel band of the flat type would have a screw, for the sling loop. Originals shouldn’t be hard to find.

Both of the Springfields pictured below are Miroku reproductions, an 1861 on top and an 1863 “transitional” type below (according to Todd Watts who defarbed it for me). Although reproductions, the barrel bands are of the correct types and you can see the differences.

I hope this is helpful - good luck!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1186.jpeg
    IMG_1186.jpeg
    1.6 MB
kh54 is correct, you need the flat earlier barrel bands, and they will be held by band retainer springs. Even though your rifle musket was made in 1864, you need the model 1861 parts. If you look for 1864 parts you will be led to model 1864 parts, many of which are different.
 
kh54 is correct, you need the flat earlier barrel bands, and they will be held by band retainer springs. Even though your rifle musket was made in 1864, you need the model 1861 parts. If you look for 1864 parts you will be led to model 1864 parts, many of which are different.
Got the new parts today .
Hopefully Dixie will take the others back
 
There is no ramrod retention spring in a 61. The rammer is retained by the swell near the tulip fitting into a slightly enlarged portion of the ramrod channel which is clearly visible in the photos of the nose cap above. The correct way to measure the bands is from the breech end of the barrel, the intersection of the tang and barrel. These dimension are from that intersection to the back (breech) side of the bands.
Front: 33.10"
Middle 21.50"
Rear: 9.87"
I don't see any sights in your photo but reproduction front & rear are available. It's likely the dovetail and screw hole for the rear sight have been filled and sometimes it's hard to find them if it was a good job. The sight locations are measured from the back of the barrel (as above) to the back side of the front sight and to the back side of the rear sight base.
Rear sight: 2.75"
Sight radius: 30.56"
The overall stock length which I assume is measured parallel with the bore and without metal fitted is 55"
The 1864 Springfield Model 1864 used a ramrod retention spring and the ramrod does not have the swell like the 1861 Model.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top