4Bear
32 Cal.
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2004
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 0
I was over at Cabela's looking at their revolvers and thinking the brassed case Colt might be just enough to squeek me into gun ownership. But when I went out to a local range everybody had Remingtons and swore off the strapless Colts rather passionately.
Technically, I have to agree, the strapped Remington must be a more reliable source of alignment for the cylinder to the barrel, but aesthetically, I have to go with the Colt and its sleek bare cylinder lining up with the cylinder. I am also thinking I want to try some cowboy shooting and the front sight on the Remington is a little high to be quickly removed from a holster, I think.
Some other food for thought... Does the Colt's barrel sit a little lower in the hand then the Remington? Is the rear sight on the hammer really so unreliable? Is the simple fixture of of the Colt's barrel really a better source of alignment? Does it even matter?
Questions, questions, questions ...
Comments anyone?
Technically, I have to agree, the strapped Remington must be a more reliable source of alignment for the cylinder to the barrel, but aesthetically, I have to go with the Colt and its sleek bare cylinder lining up with the cylinder. I am also thinking I want to try some cowboy shooting and the front sight on the Remington is a little high to be quickly removed from a holster, I think.
Some other food for thought... Does the Colt's barrel sit a little lower in the hand then the Remington? Is the rear sight on the hammer really so unreliable? Is the simple fixture of of the Colt's barrel really a better source of alignment? Does it even matter?
Questions, questions, questions ...
Comments anyone?